CANE vs. XHS ETF Comparison
Comparison of Teucrium Sugar Fund ETV (CANE) to SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS)
CANE
Teucrium Sugar Fund ETV
CANE Description
The investment seeks to replicate, net of expenses, the performance of ICE Sugar Futures Contracts. The fund seeks to have the daily changes in percentage terms of the shares' net asset value (NAV) reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of a weighted average of the closing settlement prices for three futures contracts for sugar that are traded on ICE Futures US, specifically: (1) the second-to-expire Sugar No. 11 Futures Contract, weighted 35%, (2) the third-to-expire Sugar No. 11 Futures Contract, weighted 30%, and (3) the Sugar No. 11 Futures Contract expiring in the March following the expiration month of the third-to-expire contract, weighted 35%.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$12.70
Average Daily Volume
70,755
2
XHS
SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF
XHS Description
The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$94.83
Average Daily Volume
4,091
58
Performance
| Period | CANE | XHS |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -3.80% | -0.44% |
| 60 Days | 6.36% | -1.93% |
| 90 Days | 12.33% | -0.17% |
| 12 Months | -17.78% | 15.17% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in CANE | Weight in XHS | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUM | D | 10.96% | 1.79% | 1.79% |
CANE Overweight 1 Positions Relative to XHS
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| T | A | 10.96% |
CANE Underweight 57 Positions Relative to XHS
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIMS | B | -2.83% | |
| HQY | B | -2.5% | |
| PINC | A | -2.3% | |
| SEM | B | -2.18% | |
| EHC | A | -2.18% | |
| MCK | A | -2.12% | |
| LH | A | -2.12% | |
| CVS | F | -2.12% | |
| RDNT | B | -2.06% | |
| CAH | A | -2.04% | |
| COR | A | -2.04% | |
| AMED | F | -2.02% | |
| RCM | B | -2.02% | |
| UNH | B | -2.01% | |
| DGX | A | -2.01% | |
| PDCO | F | -2.01% | |
| ADUS | D | -2.01% | |
| HSIC | F | -1.99% | |
| THC | B | -1.97% | |
| PRVA | B | -1.96% | |
| CHE | D | -1.91% | |
| GH | B | -1.89% | |
| SGRY | F | -1.89% | |
| ENSG | C | -1.87% | |
| MOH | F | -1.82% | |
| DVA | C | -1.8% | |
| HCA | D | -1.77% | |
| USPH | C | -1.75% | |
| UHS | D | -1.75% | |
| AMN | F | -1.74% | |
| CI | D | -1.73% | |
| BKD | F | -1.71% | |
| CLOV | C | -1.69% | |
| CNC | F | -1.66% | |
| AGL | F | -1.63% | |
| CRVL | B | -1.59% | |
| OMI | F | -1.57% | |
| ELV | F | -1.56% | |
| OPCH | F | -1.47% | |
| MD | C | -1.46% | |
| ASTH | F | -1.37% | |
| PGNY | F | -1.35% | |
| NEO | B | -1.35% | |
| CSTL | C | -1.25% | |
| AHCO | D | -1.21% | |
| ALHC | C | -1.2% | |
| LFST | B | -1.17% | |
| ACHC | F | -1.08% | |
| NHC | B | -0.99% | |
| PNTG | D | -0.71% | |
| CCRN | F | -0.69% | |
| CYH | F | -0.67% | |
| ACCD | F | -0.58% | |
| OPK | B | -0.56% | |
| MODV | D | -0.52% | |
| FLGT | F | -0.51% | |
| NRC | D | -0.32% |
CANE: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
XHS: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
