BEDZ vs. PGJ ETF Comparison

Comparison of AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
BEDZ

AdvisorShares Hotel ETF

BEDZ Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the hotel business. It may also invest in companies involved in other lodging and travel-related services. The fund invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ?ADRs. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$32.63

Average Daily Volume

293

Number of Holdings *

23

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.51

Average Daily Volume

191,886

Number of Holdings *

54

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period BEDZ PGJ
30 Days 7.02% -3.59%
60 Days 10.05% 14.09%
90 Days 18.56% 18.85%
12 Months 26.68% 3.75%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in BEDZ Weight in PGJ Overlap
TCOM B 4.53% 8.84% 4.53%
BEDZ Overweight 22 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
NCLH B 6.06%
RCL A 5.88%
CCL A 5.52%
EXPE B 5.36%
BKNG A 5.27%
TH C 5.12%
MCRI A 4.63%
RHP B 4.52%
PEB F 4.25%
MAR B 4.17%
BYD B 4.15%
PK D 4.05%
WH B 4.04%
INN D 3.99%
VICI C 3.78%
HST D 3.63%
APLE B 3.32%
HLT A 2.89%
IHG A 2.7%
XHR B 2.68%
GLPI C 2.55%
H B 2.22%
BEDZ Underweight 53 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
YUMC B -9.52%
JD D -8.37%
BABA D -7.56%
BIDU D -6.21%
BEKE C -4.54%
NTES C -3.64%
TME D -3.6%
ZTO F -3.39%
NIO F -3.36%
VIPS F -3.32%
HTHT D -3.26%
YMM C -3.11%
LI F -2.65%
BZ F -2.57%
QFIN A -2.33%
TAL F -2.25%
XPEV C -1.55%
GDS C -1.34%
BILI D -1.27%
ATAT C -1.18%
ATHM C -1.06%
DQ C -0.87%
ZLAB C -0.77%
MOMO D -0.68%
RLX C -0.67%
IQ F -0.67%
FINV B -0.65%
MNSO C -0.53%
JKS D -0.48%
CSIQ F -0.45%
EH C -0.45%
WB C -0.44%
TIGR D -0.43%
DDL B -0.34%
VNET C -0.28%
QD B -0.27%
LX C -0.26%
SOHU F -0.25%
NOAH C -0.24%
GOTU F -0.23%
KC A -0.19%
RERE C -0.18%
HUYA F -0.17%
API B -0.15%
DAO B -0.11%
DOYU C -0.11%
TUYA D -0.11%
WDH C -0.1%
DADA F -0.09%
BZUN F -0.07%
CAAS B -0.07%
NIU F -0.06%
CBAT F -0.05%
Compare ETFs