AMID vs. TDV ETF Comparison
Comparison of Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) to ProShares S&P Global Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV)
AMID
Argent Mid Cap ETF
AMID Description
AMID aims to outperform the Russell MidCap Index over the long term by applying Change-Based Investing strategies. The fund actively invests in stocks undergoing positive internal or external change, which the issuer believes could lead to underappreciated growth. The starting universe begins with 1,500 US mid-cap stocks that are screened for liquidity and grouped by sector. Using their proprietary Argent Alpha Model, stocks are ranked under four main categories: Value, Growth, Quality, and Stability. Stocks within each sector with positive exposure to outperforming factors are considered. The remaining companies are grouped into current and future market segments based on expected outperformance in the current or future market cycle. Finally, the fund uses fundamental analysis to select 35-50 stocks with prospect improvements at the company or industry level. Sectors may be overweighted at various times in the economic cycle. Individual securities are capped at 8%.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$37.03
Average Daily Volume
7,912
37
TDV
ProShares S&P Global Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF
TDV Description
The investment seeks investment results, before fees and expenses, that track the performance of the S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats Index (the index). The index, constructed and maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, targets companies from the U.S. technology sector and select U.S. technology-related companies from the communication services and consumer discretionary sectors. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities. It is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$77.47
Average Daily Volume
12,373
34
Performance
| Period | AMID | TDV |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 5.95% | 1.15% |
| 60 Days | 4.28% | 1.73% |
| 90 Days | 5.77% | 2.50% |
| 12 Months | 35.20% | 20.33% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in AMID | Weight in TDV | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDW | F | 2.86% | 2.34% | 2.34% |
AMID Overweight 36 Positions Relative to TDV
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FICO | B | 3.79% | |
| CTAS | B | 3.66% | |
| CPRT | A | 3.56% | |
| BLDR | D | 3.43% | |
| FTNT | C | 3.34% | |
| HLI | B | 3.2% | |
| CBZ | B | 2.93% | |
| LPLA | A | 2.87% | |
| VCTR | B | 2.86% | |
| DHI | D | 2.85% | |
| IT | C | 2.83% | |
| MEDP | D | 2.69% | |
| MUSA | A | 2.63% | |
| HCA | F | 2.49% | |
| BAH | F | 2.45% | |
| BLD | D | 2.43% | |
| OMF | A | 2.4% | |
| URI | B | 2.35% | |
| AFG | A | 2.28% | |
| GDDY | A | 2.24% | |
| A | D | 2.12% | |
| ADUS | D | 2.09% | |
| CG | A | 2.05% | |
| SCI | B | 2.05% | |
| TPX | B | 1.99% | |
| AME | A | 1.98% | |
| ICFI | F | 1.93% | |
| LNG | B | 1.69% | |
| CHDN | B | 1.57% | |
| ABG | B | 1.55% | |
| ENTG | D | 1.52% | |
| MOH | F | 1.44% | |
| PATK | D | 1.35% | |
| TTEK | F | 1.33% | |
| AX | A | 1.11% | |
| EXPO | D | 0.99% |
AMID Underweight 33 Positions Relative to TDV
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSGS | B | -3.26% | |
| DLB | B | -3.23% | |
| ORCL | B | -3.14% | |
| BMI | B | -3.14% | |
| V | A | -3.11% | |
| INTU | C | -3.08% | |
| CASS | B | -3.07% | |
| APH | A | -3.06% | |
| MSI | B | -3.02% | |
| BR | A | -3.0% | |
| TXN | C | -2.95% | |
| CSCO | B | -2.93% | |
| HPQ | B | -2.92% | |
| GLW | B | -2.89% | |
| MA | C | -2.88% | |
| ROP | B | -2.87% | |
| CGNX | C | -2.87% | |
| POWI | D | -2.83% | |
| AVT | C | -2.82% | |
| SSNC | B | -2.81% | |
| AAPL | C | -2.8% | |
| MSFT | F | -2.8% | |
| LRCX | F | -2.77% | |
| ACN | C | -2.77% | |
| ADI | D | -2.71% | |
| LFUS | F | -2.7% | |
| JKHY | D | -2.69% | |
| IBM | C | -2.67% | |
| KLAC | D | -2.65% | |
| AVGO | D | -2.63% | |
| QCOM | F | -2.57% | |
| SWKS | F | -2.52% | |
| MCHP | D | -2.49% |
AMID: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
TDV: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
