Disruptive Technology Stocks List
Symbol | Grade | Name | % Change | |
---|---|---|---|---|
MLEC | F | Moolec Science SA | -0.47 | |
RBOT | C | Vicarious Surgical Inc. | 16.17 | |
TASK | C | TaskUs, Inc. | 3.50 | |
FDTX | A | Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF | 1.33 |
Related Industries: Biotechnology Information Technology Services Medical Devices
Symbol | Grade | Name | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FDIF | A | Fidelity Disruptors ETF | 20.92 | |
MYLD | B | Cambria Micro and SmallCap Shareholder Yield ETF | 1.11 | |
TXSS | B | Texas Small Cap Equity Index ETF | 0.43 | |
FDM | B | First Trust DJ Select MicroCap ETF | 0.41 | |
SFLO | B | VictoryShares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF | 0.15 |
Compare ETFs
- Disruptive Technology
In business theory, a disruptive innovation is an innovation that creates a new market and value network and eventually displaces established market-leading firms, products, and alliances. The term was defined and first analyzed by Clayton M. Christensen and his collaborators beginning in 1995, and has been called the most influential business idea of the early 21st century. Lingfei Wu, Dashun Wang, and James A. Evans generalized this term to identify disruptive science and technological advances from more than 65 million papers, patents and software products that span the period 1954–2014. Their work was featured as the cover of the February 2019 issue of Nature and was selected as the Altmetric 100 most-discussed work in 2019.Not all innovations are disruptive, even if they are revolutionary. For example, the first automobiles in the late 19th century were not a disruptive innovation, because early automobiles were expensive luxury items that did not disrupt the market for horse-drawn vehicles. The market for transportation essentially remained intact until the debut of the lower-priced Ford Model T in 1908. The mass-produced automobile was a disruptive innovation, because it changed the transportation market, whereas the first thirty years of automobiles did not.
Disruptive innovations tend to be produced by outsiders and entrepreneurs in startups, rather than existing market-leading companies. The business environment of market leaders does not allow them to pursue disruptive innovations when they first arise, because they are not profitable enough at first and because their development can take scarce resources away from sustaining innovations (which are needed to compete against current competition). Small teams are more likely to create disruptive innovations than large teams. A disruptive process can take longer to develop than by the conventional approach and the risk associated to it is higher than the other more incremental or evolutionary forms of innovations, but once it is deployed in the market, it achieves a much faster penetration and higher degree of impact on the established markets.Beyond business and economics disruptive innovations can also be considered to disrupt complex systems, including economic and business-related aspects. Through identifying and analyzing systems for possible points of intervention, one can then design changes focused on disruptive interventions.
Popular Now
Recent Comments
- TraderMike on BOOT
- Dr_Duru on BOOT
- TraderMike on Stochastic Reached Oversold
- SuccessfulGrasshopper897 on Stochastic Reached Oversold
- Cos3 on Adding float as advanced filter criteria?
From the Blog
Featured Articles