XMLV vs. BLDG ETF Comparison

Comparison of PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (XMLV) to Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG)

XMLV

PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio

XMLV Description

The PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is compiled, maintained and calculated by Standard & Poor's, consisting of 80 out of 400 medium-capitalization range securities from the S&P MidCap 400 Index with the lowest realized volatility over the past 12 months. Volatility is a statistical measurement of the magnitude of up and down asset price fluctuations over time. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$60.81

Average Daily Volume

35,673

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

BLDG

Cambria Global Real Estate ETF

BLDG Description

The investment seeks income and capital appreciation. The fund is actively managed and seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal market conditions, primarily in the securities of domestic and foreign, including developed and emerging market, companies principally engaged in the real estate sector and real-estate related industries (collectively, ?real estate companies?) that exhibit favorable multi-factor metrics, such as value, quality and momentum, according to a quantitative methodology developed by Cambria Investment Management, L.P., the fund?s investment adviser (?Cambria?).

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.02

Average Daily Volume

3,000

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	XMLV	BLDG
30 Days	-0.07%	-1.71%
60 Days	1.32%	-1.52%
90 Days	5.24%	2.77%
12 Months	25.68%	14.41%

4 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in XMLV	Weight in BLDG	Overlap
NNN	D	1.28%	1.22%	1.22%
OHI	B	1.31%	1.32%	1.31%
SBRA	B	1.21%	1.39%	1.21%
STAG	D	1.12%	1.27%	1.12%

XMLV Overweight 75 Positions Relative to BLDG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ATR	A	1.77%
CW	B	1.75%
DTM	A	1.69%
SEIC	A	1.68%
CACI	A	1.6%
VOYA	B	1.55%
SF	A	1.48%
FHI	A	1.46%
PNM	B	1.44%
DCI	B	1.4%
THG	B	1.39%
INGR	C	1.39%
AM	C	1.38%
IBKR	A	1.38%
EHC	A	1.38%
ORI	D	1.38%
RGA	C	1.36%
IDA	A	1.35%
OGE	C	1.35%
HLI	A	1.35%
AMG	A	1.34%
UNM	A	1.32%
ADC	C	1.32%
SON	F	1.32%
GLPI	D	1.32%
RLI	B	1.31%
RPM	B	1.3%
EPR	D	1.3%
PRI	B	1.29%
NJR	D	1.29%
POST	D	1.28%
CHE	F	1.28%
ACM	A	1.28%
FLS	A	1.27%
JEF	B	1.27%
AMH	F	1.26%
NWE	D	1.26%
AFG	D	1.26%
GGG	D	1.25%
ESNT	F	1.24%
USFD	B	1.24%
SR	D	1.24%
GNTX	B	1.23%
G	C	1.23%
JHG	A	1.23%
NFG	C	1.23%
MTG	D	1.21%
POR	C	1.2%
ELS	D	1.2%
SNX	C	1.19%
CDP	B	1.18%
ALE	A	1.18%
TXRH	A	1.17%
EGP	D	1.17%
FLO	F	1.17%
BRX	C	1.17%
GEF	B	1.16%
PPC	A	1.16%
OGS	C	1.16%
KBR	B	1.14%
AVT	B	1.14%
FR	D	1.14%
SLGN	A	1.13%
BKH	D	1.12%
LSTR	D	1.1%
GATX	A	1.09%
MMS	D	1.08%
NYT	A	1.07%
MSA	F	1.07%
NEU	D	1.06%
WTRG	C	1.04%
DLB	B	1.03%
MUSA	C	0.98%
MAN	F	0.95%
CHRD	F	0.87%

XMLV Underweight 40 Positions Relative to BLDG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
KRC	B	-1.57%
FSP	A	-1.53%
SLG	B	-1.48%
BXP	C	-1.45%
MAC	B	-1.4%
WSR	B	-1.4%
AAT	C	-1.39%
DEI	B	-1.38%
AKR	B	-1.38%
PGRE	C	-1.37%
JBGS	C	-1.37%
CUZ	B	-1.37%
ESRT	C	-1.37%
PDM	C	-1.36%
IIPR	C	-1.36%
HIW	C	-1.35%
OLP	C	-1.33%
CTRE	A	-1.32%
PK	F	-1.32%
GOOD	C	-1.32%
ROIC	B	-1.32%
ALX	D	-1.31%
CTO	B	-1.31%
AVB	C	-1.31%
CSR	D	-1.3%
EPRT	C	-1.3%
WELL	A	-1.29%
CIO	D	-1.29%
IVT	A	-1.29%
LTC	A	-1.28%
FCPT	D	-1.28%
PINE	D	-1.28%
LXP	D	-1.26%
BNL	D	-1.25%
TRNO	F	-1.24%
BDN	C	-1.24%
OPI	F	-1.23%
HPP	F	-1.23%
WPC	F	-1.22%
NHI	C	-1.2%