RUNN vs. BDVG ETF Comparison
Comparison of Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) to IMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG)
RUNN
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF
RUNN Description
The fund is in an actively managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF"). Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in exchange-traded equity securities of large and mid-sized U.S. companies with market capitalizations of at least $5 billion. The fund is roughly equally-weighted with 50-75 stocks typically held in the portfolio. The fund may invest up to 20% of net assets in non-U.S. companies. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$35.38
Average Daily Volume
44,462
55
BDVG
IMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF
BDVG Description
The fund is an actively-managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF") that seeks to achieve its objective by investing at least 80% of its net assets, plus borrowings for investment purposes, in common stocks of U.S. companies that pay dividends annually, with an emphasis on stocks that have a strong track record of paying quarterly dividends or that are expected to increase their dividends over the next one to five years.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$12.20
Average Daily Volume
5,828
36
Performance
| Period | RUNN | BDVG |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 6.37% | 4.77% |
| 60 Days | 6.34% | 5.46% |
| 90 Days | 8.73% | 6.36% |
| 12 Months | 32.80% | 23.88% |
RUNN Overweight 53 Positions Relative to BDVG
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| J | F | 1.86% | |
| CW | B | 1.86% | |
| FDS | B | 1.86% | |
| AME | A | 1.86% | |
| ETN | A | 1.86% | |
| WSO | A | 1.86% | |
| PH | A | 1.85% | |
| PRI | A | 1.85% | |
| FI | A | 1.85% | |
| TXRH | A | 1.84% | |
| ITT | A | 1.83% | |
| GWW | A | 1.83% | |
| LDOS | D | 1.83% | |
| TDY | B | 1.83% | |
| EME | B | 1.82% | |
| RBA | B | 1.82% | |
| ADP | B | 1.82% | |
| BSX | C | 1.82% | |
| V | A | 1.82% | |
| BR | A | 1.81% | |
| SYK | C | 1.8% | |
| SAIA | C | 1.79% | |
| ACN | B | 1.79% | |
| BRO | B | 1.78% | |
| DRI | B | 1.78% | |
| GD | F | 1.76% | |
| IR | A | 1.75% | |
| DECK | A | 1.75% | |
| RSG | A | 1.74% | |
| GGG | B | 1.74% | |
| FELE | B | 1.74% | |
| CACI | D | 1.74% | |
| GOOG | C | 1.72% | |
| APD | A | 1.72% | |
| CSL | B | 1.72% | |
| SSNC | A | 1.71% | |
| TSCO | C | 1.71% | |
| NVT | B | 1.71% | |
| TJX | A | 1.71% | |
| ROP | B | 1.7% | |
| AJG | A | 1.68% | |
| UNH | B | 1.68% | |
| TTC | D | 1.68% | |
| CI | D | 1.67% | |
| DOX | D | 1.65% | |
| STE | F | 1.64% | |
| MMC | A | 1.64% | |
| BDX | F | 1.63% | |
| ICE | D | 1.6% | |
| AVY | D | 1.59% | |
| FCN | D | 1.57% | |
| IQV | F | 1.55% | |
| ICLR | F | 1.52% |
RUNN Underweight 34 Positions Relative to BDVG
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPM | B | -4.27% | |
| AAPL | B | -4.24% | |
| ABBV | D | -4.2% | |
| MSFT | D | -4.17% | |
| CVX | B | -4.14% | |
| NUE | D | -3.87% | |
| LMT | D | -3.81% | |
| WMT | B | -3.57% | |
| QCOM | F | -3.38% | |
| BAC | A | -3.06% | |
| WM | A | -3.06% | |
| PPL | B | -2.98% | |
| MCD | D | -2.82% | |
| LOW | C | -2.79% | |
| CSCO | A | -2.77% | |
| CB | D | -2.47% | |
| EMR | A | -2.44% | |
| MRK | F | -2.41% | |
| MDLZ | F | -2.4% | |
| PNC | A | -2.28% | |
| KMI | B | -2.06% | |
| PG | A | -1.96% | |
| JNJ | D | -1.95% | |
| ABT | B | -1.88% | |
| BMY | B | -1.88% | |
| PEP | F | -1.87% | |
| DE | B | -1.86% | |
| SCHW | A | -1.74% | |
| MTB | B | -1.71% | |
| EOG | C | -1.43% | |
| GIS | D | -1.39% | |
| WPC | D | -1.37% | |
| PFE | D | -1.06% | |
| HSY | F | -0.84% |
RUNN: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
BDVG: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
