QLTY vs. PWV ETF Comparison
Comparison of GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) to PowerShares Dynamic LargeCap Value (PWV)
QLTY
GMO U.S. Quality ETF
QLTY Description
QLTY seeks total return by investing in US companies deemed high quality. These companies are defined as having established businesses capable of delivering substantial returns on past investments, utilizing cash flows for high-return investments, or returning cash to shareholders through dividends or share buybacks. The investment strategy combines systematic factors like profitability and leverage, alongside judgmental factors such as assessments of future profitability and growth prospects. It may also use various valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow analysis and multiples of price-to-earnings, revenues, book values, or other fundamental metrics, to acquire underrated stocks. Additionally, the fund may invest in other ETFs. The fund may also invest in the GMO U.S. Treasury Fund, and money market funds. Investment decisions are not constrained by portfolio turnover rates or benchmark considerations.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$32.77
Average Daily Volume
266,232
34
PWV
PowerShares Dynamic LargeCap Value
PWV Description
The PowerShares Dynamic Large Cap Value Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Large Cap Value IntellidexSM Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to provide capital appreciation while maintaining consistent stylistically accurate exposure. The Style Intellidexes apply a rigorous 10 factor style isolation process to objectively segregate companies into their appropriate investment style and size universe. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$61.68
Average Daily Volume
32,374
49
Performance
| Period | QLTY | PWV |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 2.25% | 5.45% |
| 60 Days | 0.46% | 6.55% |
| 90 Days | 3.21% | 6.53% |
| 12 Months | 27.36% | 31.21% |
QLTY Overweight 26 Positions Relative to PWV
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT | D | 6.46% | |
| AAPL | B | 5.33% | |
| ORCL | C | 4.71% | |
| META | D | 4.5% | |
| GOOGL | C | 4.43% | |
| UNH | B | 3.62% | |
| ACN | B | 3.3% | |
| V | A | 3.22% | |
| ISRG | C | 2.92% | |
| KLAC | F | 2.85% | |
| LRCX | F | 2.85% | |
| CRM | B | 2.84% | |
| HLT | A | 2.62% | |
| ARMK | A | 2.56% | |
| AVGO | D | 2.45% | |
| MRK | F | 2.41% | |
| AMZN | C | 2.4% | |
| USB | A | 2.31% | |
| OTIS | C | 2.25% | |
| TJX | A | 2.14% | |
| GE | D | 1.73% | |
| MDLZ | F | 1.72% | |
| LLY | F | 1.61% | |
| STZ | D | 1.59% | |
| DGX | B | 1.35% | |
| TMO | F | 0.91% |
QLTY Underweight 41 Positions Relative to PWV
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAC | A | -3.72% | |
| CVX | B | -3.52% | |
| JPM | B | -3.5% | |
| IBM | C | -3.46% | |
| XOM | C | -3.27% | |
| VZ | B | -3.26% | |
| BRK.A | B | -3.25% | |
| AMGN | D | -2.81% | |
| ABBV | D | -2.73% | |
| KMI | B | -1.79% | |
| MS | B | -1.77% | |
| OKE | C | -1.75% | |
| COF | B | -1.74% | |
| DELL | C | -1.64% | |
| LNG | B | -1.64% | |
| CMI | A | -1.62% | |
| BK | A | -1.59% | |
| T | A | -1.59% | |
| JCI | C | -1.59% | |
| ET | B | -1.58% | |
| PNC | A | -1.56% | |
| URI | B | -1.53% | |
| GM | B | -1.53% | |
| MET | A | -1.51% | |
| KR | A | -1.5% | |
| CAT | B | -1.49% | |
| EOG | C | -1.46% | |
| LHX | C | -1.46% | |
| PRU | A | -1.45% | |
| AFL | B | -1.41% | |
| CB | D | -1.4% | |
| VLO | C | -1.37% | |
| RTX | D | -1.37% | |
| AIG | B | -1.37% | |
| PSX | C | -1.34% | |
| LMT | D | -1.31% | |
| KMB | C | -1.3% | |
| MPC | F | -1.28% | |
| LEN | C | -1.26% | |
| DHI | D | -1.19% | |
| CNC | F | -1.03% |
QLTY: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
PWV: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
