LRGG vs. ESGX ETF Comparison
Comparison of Macquarie Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) to Tuttle Capital Shareholders First Index ETF (ESGX)
LRGG
Macquarie Focused Large Growth ETF
LRGG Description
Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities of large capitalization companies. The fund"s securities will primarily include equity securities of growth-oriented companies selected by Delaware Management Company, the fund"s investment adviser ("Manager") that the Manager believes are high quality and have competitively advantaged business models and growth potential over the long term. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$27.80
Average Daily Volume
4,796
19
ESGX
Tuttle Capital Shareholders First Index ETF
ESGX Description
ESGX invests in US-listed companies determined to have high shareholder value, unencumbered by ESG restrictions, such as political stances or conforming to a greater social goal of stakeholder capitalism. Using a proprietary methodology, the fund assigns stocks with shareholder value creation and financial metric scores. The shareholder value creation score considers information on corporate donations, advocacy, activities, and policies gathered from different data sources. The financial metrics score separately calculates a securitys one-year and five-year price performance, closing price, cash, revenue, debt-to-equity ratio, average dividend yield, profit margin, and market capitalization. Companies are ranked according to the highest shareholder value creation and financial metric scores. The fund selects and weights 50 companies from the resulting sets of filtered companies. The index is rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$25.79
Average Daily Volume
101
49
Performance
| Period | LRGG | ESGX |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 0.94% | -0.71% |
| 60 Days | 3.30% | 0.93% |
| 90 Days | 3.25% | |
| 12 Months |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in LRGG | Weight in ESGX | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRSN | C | 2.98% | 2.16% | 2.16% |
LRGG Underweight 48 Positions Relative to ESGX
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GTLS | A | -2.58% | |
| WST | C | -2.51% | |
| TYL | B | -2.4% | |
| VTRS | A | -2.37% | |
| SEIC | B | -2.33% | |
| NWS | A | -2.33% | |
| RLI | A | -2.33% | |
| VNO | C | -2.3% | |
| GEF | A | -2.27% | |
| TPX | B | -2.26% | |
| JBHT | C | -2.24% | |
| EVRG | A | -2.21% | |
| PNR | A | -2.19% | |
| SLGN | A | -2.17% | |
| SYY | D | -2.14% | |
| IBOC | B | -2.11% | |
| EHC | B | -2.1% | |
| FFIV | B | -2.08% | |
| KIM | A | -2.07% | |
| SYNA | C | -2.06% | |
| PNW | A | -2.06% | |
| TDY | B | -2.05% | |
| DCI | B | -2.04% | |
| DXCM | C | -2.02% | |
| ROL | B | -2.02% | |
| MANH | D | -1.97% | |
| RVTY | F | -1.95% | |
| KEYS | A | -1.92% | |
| FRT | B | -1.91% | |
| LKQ | F | -1.88% | |
| HST | C | -1.88% | |
| MAA | B | -1.85% | |
| STE | D | -1.82% | |
| POOL | C | -1.82% | |
| CNP | A | -1.81% | |
| SWKS | F | -1.81% | |
| O | C | -1.75% | |
| GPC | D | -1.74% | |
| POST | C | -1.73% | |
| WEX | D | -1.7% | |
| MCHP | F | -1.69% | |
| KNSL | B | -1.67% | |
| EGP | D | -1.67% | |
| BCO | F | -1.54% | |
| LNTH | D | -1.52% | |
| HII | F | -1.45% | |
| QRVO | F | -1.19% | |
| ENPH | F | -1.09% |
LRGG: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
ESGX: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
