KWEB vs. PGJ ETF Comparison

Comparison of KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
KWEB

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF

KWEB Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of a specific foreign equity securities benchmark. The fund will normally invest at least 80% of its total assets in equity securities of its current benchmark, the CSI Overseas China Internet Index or in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to measure the performance of the investable universe of publicly traded China-based companies whose primary business or businesses are in the Internet and Internet-related sectors. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$30.67

Average Daily Volume

30,469,366

Number of Holdings *

16

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.51

Average Daily Volume

191,886

Number of Holdings *

54

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period KWEB PGJ
30 Days -3.14% -3.59%
60 Days 16.59% 14.09%
90 Days 19.31% 18.85%
12 Months 13.29% 3.75%
14 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in KWEB Weight in PGJ Overlap
ATHM C 1.17% 1.06% 1.06%
BABA D 9.61% 7.56% 7.56%
BEKE C 4.75% 4.54% 4.54%
BIDU D 3.29% 6.21% 3.29%
BILI D 3.66% 1.27% 1.27%
BZ F 2.4% 2.57% 2.4%
IQ F 0.42% 0.67% 0.42%
QFIN A 2.81% 2.33% 2.33%
TAL F 2.9% 2.25% 2.25%
TCOM B 4.63% 8.84% 4.63%
TME D 2.87% 3.6% 2.87%
VIPS F 3.38% 3.32% 3.32%
WB C 0.48% 0.44% 0.44%
YMM C 3.6% 3.11% 3.11%
KWEB Overweight 2 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
PDD F 6.04%
YY B 0.79%
KWEB Underweight 40 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
YUMC B -9.52%
JD D -8.37%
NTES C -3.64%
ZTO F -3.39%
NIO F -3.36%
HTHT D -3.26%
LI F -2.65%
XPEV C -1.55%
GDS C -1.34%
ATAT C -1.18%
DQ C -0.87%
ZLAB C -0.77%
MOMO D -0.68%
RLX C -0.67%
FINV B -0.65%
MNSO C -0.53%
JKS D -0.48%
CSIQ F -0.45%
EH C -0.45%
TIGR D -0.43%
DDL B -0.34%
VNET C -0.28%
QD B -0.27%
LX C -0.26%
SOHU F -0.25%
NOAH C -0.24%
GOTU F -0.23%
KC A -0.19%
RERE C -0.18%
HUYA F -0.17%
API B -0.15%
DAO B -0.11%
DOYU C -0.11%
TUYA D -0.11%
WDH C -0.1%
DADA F -0.09%
BZUN F -0.07%
CAAS B -0.07%
NIU F -0.06%
CBAT F -0.05%
Compare ETFs