IXJ vs. RXL ETF Comparison

Comparison of iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) to ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL)

IXJ

iShares Global Healthcare ETF

IXJ Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of global equities in the healthcare sector. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the S&P Global 1200 Healthcare Sector IndexTM (the "underlying index"), which measures the performance of companies that S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC ("S&P"), deems to be a part of the healthcare sector of the economy and that S&P believes are important to global markets. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$90.41

Average Daily Volume

132,450

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

RXL

ProShares Ultra Health Care

RXL Description

The investment seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Health CareSM Index. The fund invests in securities and derivatives that ProShare Advisors believes, in combination, should have similar daily return characteristics as two times (2x) the daily return of the index. The index measures the performance of the healthcare sector of the U.S. equity market. Component companies include, among others, health care providers, biotechnology companies, medical supplies, advanced medical devices and pharmaceuticals. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$48.53

Average Daily Volume

6,405

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	IXJ	RXL
30 Days	-5.50%	-8.49%
60 Days	-8.05%	-13.53%
90 Days	-9.84%	-14.84%
12 Months	10.11%	16.80%

61 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in IXJ	Weight in RXL	Overlap
A	D	0.52%	0.55%	0.52%
ABBV	D	4.08%	4.3%	4.08%
ABT	B	2.72%	2.87%	2.72%
ALGN	D	0.22%	0.22%	0.22%
AMGN	D	2.16%	2.28%	2.16%
BAX	D	0.22%	0.23%	0.22%
BDX	F	0.89%	0.94%	0.89%
BIIB	F	0.34%	0.34%	0.34%
BMY	B	1.63%	1.7%	1.63%
BSX	B	1.75%	1.85%	1.75%
CAH	B	0.41%	0.42%	0.41%
CI	F	1.23%	1.3%	1.23%
CNC	D	0.42%	0.44%	0.42%
COR	B	0.58%	0.61%	0.58%
CRL	C	0.15%	0.15%	0.15%
CTLT	B	0.15%	0.15%	0.15%
CVS	D	0.94%	1.0%	0.94%
DGX	A	0.24%	0.25%	0.24%
DHR	F	2.09%	2.21%	2.09%
DVA	B	0.1%	0.1%	0.1%
DXCM	D	0.41%	0.43%	0.41%
ELV	F	1.28%	1.35%	1.28%
EW	C	0.54%	0.57%	0.54%
GEHC	F	0.52%	0.54%	0.52%
GILD	C	1.56%	1.65%	1.56%
HCA	F	0.87%	0.92%	0.87%
HOLX	D	0.24%	0.26%	0.24%
HSIC	B	0.12%	0.12%	0.12%
HUM	C	0.47%	0.49%	0.47%
IDXX	F	0.48%	0.5%	0.48%
INCY	C	0.17%	0.18%	0.17%
IQV	D	0.48%	0.5%	0.48%
ISRG	A	2.59%	2.74%	2.59%
JNJ	D	4.7%	5.25%	4.7%
LH	C	0.27%	0.29%	0.27%
LLY	F	8.42%	8.9%	8.42%
MCK	B	1.08%	1.14%	1.08%
MDT	D	1.5%	1.58%	1.5%
MOH	F	0.25%	0.26%	0.25%
MRK	F	3.39%	3.58%	3.39%
MRNA	F	0.12%	0.19%	0.12%
MTD	D	0.36%	0.38%	0.36%
PFE	D	2.02%	2.12%	2.02%
PODD	C	0.25%	0.26%	0.25%
REGN	F	1.13%	1.19%	1.13%
RMD	C	0.46%	0.49%	0.46%
RVTY	F	0.2%	0.21%	0.2%
SOLV	C	0.13%	0.13%	0.13%
STE	F	0.3%	0.31%	0.3%
SYK	C	1.79%	1.89%	1.79%
TECH	D	0.16%	0.16%	0.16%
TFX	F	0.13%	0.13%	0.13%
TMO	F	2.76%	2.92%	2.76%
UHS	D	0.16%	0.17%	0.16%
UNH	C	7.43%	7.86%	7.43%
VRTX	F	1.7%	1.79%	1.7%
VTRS	A	0.22%	0.22%	0.22%
WAT	B	0.31%	0.32%	0.31%
WST	C	0.33%	0.35%	0.33%
ZBH	C	0.3%	0.32%	0.3%
ZTS	D	1.09%	1.14%	1.09%

IXJ Overweight 2 Positions Relative to RXL

	Symbol	Grade	Weight
	COO	D	0.27%
	MBAVU	D	0.05%

IXJ Underweight 0 Positions Relative to RXL

	Symbol	Grade	Weight