IHF vs. CANE ETF Comparison
Comparison of iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF (IHF) to Teucrium Sugar Fund ETV (CANE)
IHF
iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF
IHF Description
The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. equities in the healthcare providers sector. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index (the "underlying index"), which measures the performance of the healthcare providers sector of the U.S. equity market. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$51.69
Average Daily Volume
102,992
67
CANE
Teucrium Sugar Fund ETV
CANE Description
The investment seeks to replicate, net of expenses, the performance of ICE Sugar Futures Contracts. The fund seeks to have the daily changes in percentage terms of the shares' net asset value (NAV) reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of a weighted average of the closing settlement prices for three futures contracts for sugar that are traded on ICE Futures US, specifically: (1) the second-to-expire Sugar No. 11 Futures Contract, weighted 35%, (2) the third-to-expire Sugar No. 11 Futures Contract, weighted 30%, and (3) the Sugar No. 11 Futures Contract expiring in the March following the expiration month of the third-to-expire contract, weighted 35%.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$11.90
Average Daily Volume
24,133
2
Performance
| Period | IHF | CANE |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -0.83% | -10.26% |
| 60 Days | -2.03% | -5.63% |
| 90 Days | -1.03% | -14.25% |
| 12 Months | 4.50% | -12.07% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in IHF | Weight in CANE | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUM | F | 4.07% | 10.96% | 4.07% |
IHF Overweight 66 Positions Relative to CANE
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNH | C | 23.38% | |
| ELV | B | 14.25% | |
| CI | C | 9.7% | |
| HCA | D | 4.38% | |
| CNC | C | 4.3% | |
| CVS | F | 4.16% | |
| VEEV | D | 4.04% | |
| MOH | F | 3.37% | |
| LH | F | 2.91% | |
| DGX | A | 2.61% | |
| THC | A | 1.94% | |
| UHS | C | 1.77% | |
| CHE | F | 1.45% | |
| EHC | A | 1.42% | |
| DVA | B | 1.27% | |
| ACHC | F | 1.16% | |
| HQY | D | 1.15% | |
| ENSG | D | 1.13% | |
| OPCH | F | 0.9% | |
| RDNT | A | 0.54% | |
| EVH | F | 0.54% | |
| DOCS | F | 0.51% | |
| SEM | B | 0.51% | |
| AMED | D | 0.51% | |
| PGNY | F | 0.45% | |
| PINC | F | 0.43% | |
| RCM | D | 0.41% | |
| AMN | D | 0.39% | |
| CRVL | C | 0.37% | |
| GH | D | 0.37% | |
| TDOC | F | 0.36% | |
| PRVA | F | 0.32% | |
| SGRY | F | 0.31% | |
| CERT | D | 0.31% | |
| HIMS | D | 0.31% | |
| NEO | D | 0.3% | |
| AGL | F | 0.28% | |
| ASTH | D | 0.27% | |
| USPH | C | 0.26% | |
| ADUS | C | 0.26% | |
| SDGR | F | 0.23% | |
| BKD | A | 0.22% | |
| NHC | D | 0.21% | |
| PHR | F | 0.19% | |
| SLP | B | 0.12% | |
| MD | D | 0.12% | |
| PNTG | A | 0.11% | |
| LFST | D | 0.1% | |
| CSTL | B | 0.1% | |
| CCRN | F | 0.1% | |
| HSTM | B | 0.1% | |
| ALHC | B | 0.09% | |
| ACCD | F | 0.09% | |
| OPK | C | 0.09% | |
| GDRX | B | 0.09% | |
| NRC | D | 0.08% | |
| CYH | B | 0.07% | |
| FLGT | F | 0.07% | |
| DH | F | 0.06% | |
| AGTI | B | 0.06% | |
| HCAT | F | 0.06% | |
| MODV | D | 0.05% | |
| DCGO | F | 0.05% | |
| CLOV | F | 0.04% | |
| SHCR | F | 0.04% | |
| AMWL | F | 0.02% |
IHF Underweight 1 Positions Relative to CANE
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| T | C | -10.96% |
IHF: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
CANE: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
