GMF vs. MFEM ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) to PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM)
GMF

SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF

GMF Description

The investment seeks investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index. The fund employs a sampling strategy in seeking to track the performance of the S&P Asia Pacific Emerging BMI Index. It generally invests at least 80% of its total assets in the securities comprising the index or in ADRs or GDRs based on securities comprising the index. The index is a market capitalization weighted index designed to define and measure the investable universe of publicly traded companies domiciled in emerging Asian Pacific markets. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$108.28

Average Daily Volume

15,563

Number of Holdings *

59

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
MFEM

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF

MFEM Description The investment seeks to track the investment results of the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Index. The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its total assets (exclusive of collateral held from securities lending) in the component securities of the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Index. The underlying index is constructed by RAFI Indices, LLC using a rules-based approach to construct factor portfolios within the underlying index. The underlying index consists of factor portfolios, each of which emphasizes one of the following factors: value, low volatility, quality and momentum.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$20.07

Average Daily Volume

10,912

Number of Holdings *

29

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period GMF MFEM
30 Days 3.19% 2.91%
60 Days 4.78% 4.02%
90 Days 11.54% 7.74%
12 Months 13.17% 13.66%
10 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in GMF Weight in MFEM Overlap
CHT C 0.22% 0.36% 0.22%
LI F 0.21% 0.13% 0.13%
NIO D 0.09% 0.03% 0.03%
PDD B 1.32% 0.31% 0.31%
SIMO D 0.06% 0.05% 0.05%
TME A 0.05% 0.42% 0.05%
VIPS D 0.1% 0.14% 0.1%
WIT D 0.29% 0.12% 0.12%
YUMC F 0.29% 0.08% 0.08%
ZTO B 0.19% 0.16% 0.16%
GMF Overweight 49 Positions Relative to MFEM
Symbol Grade Weight
TSM C 7.83%
BABA B 2.16%
HDB C 1.6%
IBN A 1.23%
INFY F 0.96%
BIDU C 0.46%
TCOM A 0.4%
UMC C 0.4%
MMYT B 0.18%
BGNE D 0.14%
BEKE B 0.12%
TAL B 0.11%
YMM A 0.07%
LEGN F 0.07%
BZ A 0.07%
XPEV D 0.06%
BILI B 0.05%
YY C 0.03%
ATHM C 0.03%
DQ F 0.03%
MNSO B 0.03%
JKS D 0.02%
MOMO C 0.02%
QFIN A 0.02%
HIMX D 0.02%
IQ B 0.02%
RLX B 0.02%
QD A 0.01%
FANH F 0.01%
NOAH B 0.01%
DAO F 0.01%
WB C 0.01%
GDS C 0.01%
SOHU B 0.01%
TIGR D 0.01%
GOTU C 0.01%
DADA D 0.0%
IMAB F 0.0%
API D 0.0%
ZH F 0.0%
NIU C 0.0%
IBN A 0.0%
LX D 0.0%
CAN F 0.0%
YI F 0.0%
TUYA C 0.0%
VNET D 0.0%
BTBT F 0.0%
HUYA B 0.0%
GMF Underweight 19 Positions Relative to MFEM
Symbol Grade Weight
NTES C -0.71%
VALE D -0.63%
SHG C -0.44%
KB B -0.34%
KT D -0.29%
KEP D -0.26%
SKM D -0.25%
GGB D -0.19%
BCH A -0.16%
LPL D -0.15%
BRFS B -0.13%
SBSW D -0.12%
ASAI D -0.07%
FN D -0.06%
SGRP B -0.06%
CAR D -0.04%
SBLK A -0.03%
AKO.A B -0.02%
PAC A -0.02%
Compare ETFs