GK vs. SCLZ ETF Comparison
Comparison of AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) to Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ)
GK
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
GK Description
GK seeks to provide a broad thematic exposure by actively investing in a growth-focused portfolio of US companies across a variety of long-term macro trends. It uses a multi-thematic approach to concentrate on disruptive investment themes while ensuring diversification across holdings. In selecting stocks, the fund adviser uses a three-part system which involves fundamental, technical, and qualitative analysis on firms that could benefit from long-term changes in the market. The funds investments may be of any market capitalization and may focus on innovative companies related to renewable energy and sustainable transportation, technology frontiers, video gaming and Esports, cannabis, online gambling, top consumer brands, pet and animal wellness, real estate disruption, healthcare and biotechnology, and the media industry. The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$22.54
Average Daily Volume
3,196
30
SCLZ
Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
SCLZ Description
SCLZ aims to maximize income through a portfolio of US dividend-paying companies combined with a covered call writing strategy. This strategy provides a potential buffer against market volatility, although the reduction is limited to the amount of option premium received. Based on the large- and mid-cap stocks of the OShares Focused Quality Dividend Index, the fund selects 50 names based on a composite score for quality and growth characteristics. The composite score considers quality factors, dividend growth, dividend coverage, and dividend yield. Note some stocks with superior dividend payouts and higher capital appreciation potential may be excluded if option premium potential is too low. Quarterly, constituents are re-ranked based on historic dividend yield and potential capital appreciation, with holdings sold when they are no longer listed. Risk management involves establishing pre-defined exit points for each option to reduce downside exposure while maximizing income.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$54.45
Average Daily Volume
1,700
49
Performance
Period | GK | SCLZ |
---|---|---|
30 Days | 4.37% | 0.58% |
60 Days | 6.23% | 1.63% |
90 Days | 6.00% | 2.59% |
12 Months | 30.85% |
GK Overweight 23 Positions Relative to SCLZ
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
NVDA | C | 8.86% | |
NFLX | A | 6.55% | |
TT | A | 5.6% | |
LEN | D | 5.05% | |
BX | A | 5.01% | |
DIS | B | 4.88% | |
NVO | D | 4.35% | |
GOOG | C | 4.25% | |
AMZN | C | 4.09% | |
IBIT | A | 3.94% | |
MGM | D | 3.75% | |
DELL | C | 2.15% | |
SYK | C | 1.81% | |
WMT | A | 1.8% | |
UBER | D | 1.63% | |
LPLA | A | 1.61% | |
ASML | F | 1.47% | |
ONON | A | 1.38% | |
AMD | F | 1.38% | |
VICI | C | 1.07% | |
FLUT | A | 0.91% | |
TSLA | B | 0.53% | |
REGN | F | 0.42% |
GK Underweight 42 Positions Relative to SCLZ
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
GOOGL | C | -5.41% | |
JPM | A | -3.37% | |
UNH | C | -2.86% | |
V | A | -2.85% | |
MA | C | -2.49% | |
PG | A | -2.43% | |
JNJ | D | -2.25% | |
CSCO | B | -1.93% | |
KO | D | -1.89% | |
MRK | F | -1.83% | |
INTU | C | -1.81% | |
PM | B | -1.8% | |
CAT | B | -1.76% | |
TXN | C | -1.76% | |
ABT | B | -1.75% | |
MCD | D | -1.75% | |
ACN | C | -1.71% | |
QCOM | F | -1.68% | |
PEP | F | -1.68% | |
HON | B | -1.65% | |
TJX | A | -1.59% | |
ADP | B | -1.53% | |
MO | A | -1.49% | |
SBUX | A | -1.48% | |
DE | A | -1.48% | |
APH | A | -1.47% | |
LMT | D | -1.44% | |
ITW | B | -1.43% | |
MMC | B | -1.43% | |
PCAR | B | -1.42% | |
AON | A | -1.42% | |
SNA | A | -1.38% | |
CTAS | B | -1.37% | |
ZTS | D | -1.32% | |
MDLZ | F | -1.28% | |
PAYX | C | -1.27% | |
OTIS | C | -1.27% | |
MSCI | C | -1.26% | |
CTSH | B | -1.23% | |
YUM | B | -1.2% | |
CBOE | B | -1.16% | |
HSY | F | -1.09% |
GK: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
SCLZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords