FITE vs. XMLV ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) to PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (XMLV)

FITE

SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

FITE Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho Future Security Index. Under normal market conditions, the fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index is comprised of U.S.-listed equity securities (including depositary receipts) of companies domiciled across developed and emerging markets worldwide which are included in the Future Security sector as determined by a classification standard produced by the index provider. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$67.40

Average Daily Volume

4,145

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

XMLV

PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio

XMLV Description

The PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is compiled, maintained and calculated by Standard & Poor's, consisting of 80 out of 400 medium-capitalization range securities from the S&P MidCap 400 Index with the lowest realized volatility over the past 12 months. Volatility is a statistical measurement of the magnitude of up and down asset price fluctuations over time. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$64.32

Average Daily Volume

30,401

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	FITE	XMLV
30 Days	6.73%	4.62%
60 Days	11.49%	6.78%
90 Days	10.84%	8.41%
12 Months	34.85%	29.36%

2 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in FITE	Weight in XMLV	Overlap
	CACI	D	1.43%	1.39%	1.39%
	KBR	F	1.22%	0.99%	0.99%

FITE Overweight 58 Positions Relative to XMLV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
RKLB	A	5.8%
FTNT	C	2.32%
S	B	2.19%
FFIV	B	2.1%
PSN	D	2.08%
KTOS	B	1.94%
LDOS	C	1.92%
MOG.A	B	1.88%
CSCO	B	1.86%
PANW	B	1.8%
OII	B	1.8%
NET	B	1.79%
VRNS	D	1.79%
TDY	B	1.76%
NOC	D	1.75%
NTCT	C	1.75%
LMT	D	1.74%
HEI	A	1.74%
LHX	C	1.71%
ATEN	A	1.68%
RTX	D	1.67%
CYBR	A	1.67%
AVGO	D	1.66%
MIR	A	1.66%
COHR	B	1.64%
MRCY	C	1.61%
ZS	B	1.6%
CHKP	C	1.6%
OSPN	A	1.58%
OSIS	A	1.57%
RDWR	B	1.56%
DDOG	A	1.55%
RPD	B	1.55%
JNPR	D	1.54%
QLYS	B	1.54%
IRDM	D	1.51%
ERJ	A	1.49%
ZD	B	1.49%
AKAM	D	1.44%
AVAV	C	1.44%
TENB	C	1.44%
HXL	F	1.36%
SANM	B	1.31%
CRWD	B	1.28%
OKTA	C	1.26%
DCO	C	1.22%
BRKR	D	1.21%
GD	D	1.2%
APH	A	1.18%
TXT	D	1.14%
BA	F	1.1%
NABL	F	1.09%
VREX	B	1.01%
HII	F	0.94%
MVIS	F	0.84%
PL	B	0.83%
VSAT	F	0.8%
MASS	F	0.12%

FITE Underweight 77 Positions Relative to XMLV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
DTM	A	-1.87%
SEIC	B	-1.8%
ATR	B	-1.8%
CW	C	-1.78%
IBKR	A	-1.61%
SF	B	-1.6%
FHI	B	-1.55%
VOYA	B	-1.52%
INGR	C	-1.49%
IDA	A	-1.47%
UNM	A	-1.46%
HLI	A	-1.45%
THG	A	-1.45%
ORI	A	-1.44%
PNM	B	-1.44%
EHC	B	-1.44%
RGA	A	-1.43%
DCI	B	-1.41%
JEF	A	-1.41%
G	B	-1.4%
RLI	A	-1.4%
JHG	B	-1.39%
FLS	B	-1.39%
AM	A	-1.35%
OGE	A	-1.34%
PRI	B	-1.33%
AFG	A	-1.32%
RPM	A	-1.32%
GGG	B	-1.32%
USFD	A	-1.31%
ADC	A	-1.29%
ACM	B	-1.28%
NJR	A	-1.28%
AMG	B	-1.28%
TXRH	B	-1.25%
GLPI	C	-1.23%
SON	F	-1.22%
PPC	C	-1.22%
NWE	B	-1.22%
GNTX	C	-1.22%
OHI	C	-1.21%
SR	A	-1.21%
ELS	C	-1.2%
GEF	A	-1.2%
AMH	C	-1.19%
POST	C	-1.19%
EPR	C	-1.18%
CHE	D	-1.17%
BRX	A	-1.17%
GATX	A	-1.16%
NFG	A	-1.16%
SLGN	A	-1.16%
ALE	A	-1.15%
OGS	A	-1.14%
LSTR	D	-1.13%
BKH	A	-1.13%
SBRA	C	-1.13%
MTG	C	-1.13%
SNX	D	-1.11%
FLO	D	-1.11%
POR	C	-1.1%
EGP	D	-1.09%
ESNT	F	-1.09%
NNN	C	-1.09%
CDP	C	-1.08%
AVT	C	-1.08%
FR	D	-1.07%
MUSA	B	-1.07%
MSA	F	-1.07%
NEU	D	-1.04%
STAG	D	-1.04%
NYT	D	-1.03%
DLB	B	-1.01%
WTRG	B	-0.98%
MMS	F	-0.97%
MAN	F	-0.92%
CHRD	D	-0.87%