FFLG vs. QYLE ETF Comparison

Comparison of Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) to Global X Nasdaq 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE)

FFLG

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF

FFLG Description

FFLG seeks to achieve long-term capital growth by investing in large-cap companies believed to have above-average growth potential. The adviser generally defines large-caps as companies with similar market capitalizations to Russell 1000 or S&P 500 companies. Growth is measured based on factors such as earnings or revenue. Stocks are selected using fundamental analysis of factors such as financial condition and industry position of each issuer, as well as market and economic conditions. The adviser then incorporates a quantitative portfolio construction process to emphasize securities in which the adviser has high conviction, subject to risk, liquidity, and trading characteristics. The fund invests in both US and non-US companies. Despite its large-cap focus, the fund's strategy can lead to investments in small- and mid-cap companies. Before February 26, 2024, the fund traded as Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF under the ticker FGRO. The fund previously used a semitransparent ETF structure

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$23.88

Average Daily Volume

45,976

Number of Holdings ^*

100

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

QYLE

Global X Nasdaq 100 ESG Covered Call ETF

QYLE Description

The fund invests at least 80% of its net assets, plus borrowings for investment purposes (if any), in the securities of the Nasdaq-100 ESG BuyWrite Index (the underlying index). The fund's 80% investment policy is non-fundamental and requires 60 days prior written notice to shareholders before it can be changed. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.36

Average Daily Volume

1,730

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	FFLG	QYLE
30 Days	3.09%	2.37%
60 Days	5.70%	5.98%
90 Days	1.09%	4.75%
12 Months	45.65%	21.89%

9 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in FFLG	Weight in QYLE	Overlap
AAPL	C	2.2%	11.1%	2.2%
ADBE	F	1.01%	2.28%	1.01%
AMD	C	1.93%	2.11%	1.93%
AMZN	C	5.21%	2.5%	2.5%
AVGO	C	0.04%	5.53%	0.04%
MSFT	C	10.56%	10.38%	10.38%
NFLX	B	0.55%	2.55%	0.55%
NVDA	C	7.82%	10.59%	7.82%
TSLA	C	0.01%	2.11%	0.01%

FFLG Overweight 91 Positions Relative to QYLE

Symbol	Grade	Weight
META	B	5.36%
GOOG	D	4.66%
UBER	C	3.45%
TMUS	B	2.86%
GOOGL	D	2.8%
ROKU	D	2.65%
UNH	C	2.14%
ON	D	1.9%
BSX	B	1.88%
SQ	D	1.85%
FLEX	B	1.84%
NXPI	D	1.81%
SE	B	1.73%
V	C	1.57%
GPN	D	1.32%
LLY	D	1.25%
VRT	C	1.2%
LPLA	D	1.04%
FND	C	0.97%
MDB	D	0.92%
ORCL	B	0.91%
HUM	F	0.89%
MQ	F	0.87%
SNAP	D	0.87%
EPAM	F	0.86%
NOW	C	0.84%
MRVL	D	0.8%
CRM	C	0.77%
BA	F	0.74%
ZI	D	0.68%
DT	C	0.67%
CVNA	B	0.66%
PCG	C	0.64%
DDOG	D	0.64%
TSM	C	0.64%
MA	B	0.59%
INTU	D	0.58%
HUBS	D	0.55%
CYTK	F	0.55%
PEN	D	0.54%
DLO	F	0.51%
CNC	D	0.5%
CEG	C	0.49%
JBL	C	0.47%
AGL	F	0.46%
TMDX	C	0.46%
TMO	B	0.42%
BJ	D	0.4%
PCVX	C	0.4%
LOW	B	0.4%
DHR	B	0.38%
AMT	C	0.38%
INTA	C	0.36%
AR	C	0.34%
LYFT	D	0.29%
MGNI	D	0.29%
GFS	F	0.28%
AMAT	D	0.26%
LITE	B	0.26%
ACVA	C	0.25%
DV	F	0.23%
ARGX	B	0.22%
OVV	F	0.22%
CLDX	F	0.22%
PANW	D	0.19%
LULU	D	0.17%
ETN	C	0.17%
COHR	C	0.16%
PSTG	F	0.15%
BE	F	0.14%
KO	B	0.14%
APO	B	0.12%
NUVL	D	0.11%
MRNA	F	0.1%
ACN	C	0.1%
NVO	F	0.1%
REGN	D	0.1%
ALNY	C	0.1%
CHTR	D	0.09%
ZNTL	D	0.08%
KROS	C	0.07%
ALXO	F	0.06%
SNOW	F	0.06%
W	C	0.05%
ANET	C	0.05%
FSLR	C	0.05%
VLTO	B	0.04%
ARM	C	0.03%
LEN	B	0.02%
ASND	C	0.0%
ALHC	C	0.0%

FFLG Underweight 1 Positions Relative to QYLE

	Symbol	Grade	Weight
	LIN	B	-2.31%