DIVP vs. BUSA ETF Comparison

Comparison of Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP) to Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA)
DIVP

Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF

DIVP Description

DIVP invests in large- and mid-cap value stocks that generally have higher dividend yield than the average of the funds US benchmark. The fund identifies value stocks that have low price-to-earnings ratio with above-average earnings and dividend growth potential. Companies are screened using fundamental research. The fund may invest up to 30% in non-US companies in the form of ADRs. While the portfolio is not rebalanced systematically, weighting is roughly equal to avoid overweighting of individual securities. To generate additional income, the fund selectively writes covered call options with a target range of between 25-40%. However, the covered call overlay limits participation in potential gains if shares increase in value. The adviser may sell stocks that are no longer viewed as attractive based on growth potential, dividend yield, or price. As an actively managed ETF, the fund manager has full discretion to make buy, hold, or sell decisions at any time.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.05

Average Daily Volume

1,466

Number of Holdings *

32

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
BUSA

Brandes U.S. Value ETF

BUSA Description The fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF") that seeks to attain its investment objective by investing primarily in equity securities of U.S. companies. Under normal market conditions, the fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes), measured at the time of purchase, in securities of U.S. companies.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$33.62

Average Daily Volume

25,043

Number of Holdings *

55

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period DIVP BUSA
30 Days 1.06% 4.78%
60 Days 2.01% 6.46%
90 Days 4.33% 6.78%
12 Months 29.83%
12 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in DIVP Weight in BUSA Overlap
BAC A 3.33% 2.86% 2.86%
C A 3.35% 2.38% 2.38%
CMCSA B 3.23% 2.48% 2.48%
CSCO B 4.46% 1.06% 1.06%
CVX A 3.51% 3.36% 3.36%
GD F 2.03% 0.91% 0.91%
JCI C 2.55% 0.87% 0.87%
JPM A 2.41% 2.2% 2.2%
KVUE A 3.28% 1.53% 1.53%
MRK F 3.12% 1.92% 1.92%
SYY B 2.92% 0.96% 0.96%
TFC A 3.34% 1.08% 1.08%
DIVP Overweight 20 Positions Relative to BUSA
Symbol Grade Weight
EOG A 4.39%
BMY B 4.1%
MDT D 3.88%
VICI C 3.83%
DUK C 3.6%
PPL B 3.6%
PM B 3.47%
CAG D 3.25%
VZ C 3.24%
XOM B 3.22%
RTX C 2.89%
DOC D 2.86%
MO A 2.73%
BAX D 2.67%
IBM C 2.62%
TRV B 2.21%
DOW F 2.1%
RIO D 1.81%
GPC D 1.81%
UPS C 1.75%
DIVP Underweight 43 Positions Relative to BUSA
Symbol Grade Weight
FI A -3.53%
MCK B -3.11%
WFC A -2.9%
FLEX A -2.58%
PNC B -2.57%
GOOG C -2.41%
WTW B -2.4%
DOX D -2.34%
CI F -2.26%
FDX B -2.24%
CTVA C -2.18%
HAL C -2.11%
EMR A -2.1%
CTSH B -2.06%
TXT D -2.05%
OMC C -2.04%
SSNC B -2.02%
SNY F -1.96%
PFE D -1.95%
BK A -1.95%
WRB A -1.91%
JNJ D -1.77%
INGR B -1.69%
HCA F -1.68%
AIG B -1.61%
CAH B -1.57%
ETR B -1.55%
LH C -1.49%
ACGL D -1.44%
AZO C -1.43%
MU D -1.31%
STT A -1.28%
CVS D -1.19%
LKQ D -1.15%
WKC D -1.09%
KNX B -1.08%
OMF A -1.02%
GTES A -1.01%
SLB C -0.99%
BRK.A B -0.98%
MHK D -0.83%
OTEX D -0.54%
QRVO F -0.5%
Compare ETFs