CQQQ vs. ERTH ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim China Technology ETF (CQQQ) to Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH)
CQQQ

Guggenheim China Technology ETF

CQQQ Description

The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund's fees and expenses, of an equity index called the AlphaShares China Technology Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its assets in common stock, ADRs, ADSs, GDRs and IDRs that comprise the index and depositary receipts or shares representing common stocks included in the index. The index is designed to measure and monitor the performance of the universe of publicly-traded companies which are based in mainland China, Hong Kong or Macau, are in the Information Technology Sector, as defined by GICS and are open to foreign investment. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$36.60

Average Daily Volume

195,968

Number of Holdings *

9

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
ERTH

Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF

ERTH Description The Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (Fund) is based on the MSCI Global Environment Select Index (Index). The Fund will generally invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the Index. The Index is comprised of companies that focus on offering products or services that contribute to a more environmentally sustainable economy by making a more efficient use of global resources. The Index is designed to maximize exposure to six Environmental Impact Themes: alternative energy, energy efficiency, green building, sustainable water, pollution prevention and control, and sustainable agriculture. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$42.10

Average Daily Volume

13,897

Number of Holdings *

41

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period CQQQ ERTH
30 Days 13.03% 1.68%
60 Days 13.14% -0.62%
90 Days 30.95% 2.57%
12 Months -10.46% -6.61%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in CQQQ Weight in ERTH Overlap
TUYA C 0.32% 0.1% 0.1%
CQQQ Overweight 8 Positions Relative to ERTH
Symbol Grade Weight
PDD B 9.46%
BIDU C 6.87%
BILI B 3.03%
ATHM C 1.31%
YY C 0.8%
GDS C 0.62%
WB C 0.54%
DADA D 0.16%
CQQQ Underweight 40 Positions Relative to ERTH
Symbol Grade Weight
DLR B -5.36%
TSLA D -4.63%
FSLR B -4.43%
LI F -3.73%
ENPH F -3.53%
WMS C -2.74%
NIO D -1.77%
DAR F -1.64%
RIVN F -1.51%
MTH A -1.5%
BMI A -1.33%
KBH B -1.31%
XPEV D -1.13%
VNO D -1.05%
WFG D -1.05%
ORA C -0.94%
CUZ A -0.89%
SEDG F -0.8%
NEP C -0.67%
LCID D -0.59%
DEI B -0.57%
RUN D -0.54%
ARRY D -0.47%
SHLS F -0.36%
PLUG F -0.31%
AAT B -0.29%
PGRE B -0.2%
BZH D -0.19%
BDN B -0.19%
REX B -0.18%
ERII F -0.18%
CHPT F -0.11%
RENB F -0.11%
RDUS F -0.09%
MERC A -0.08%
STEM F -0.07%
AMPS F -0.07%
MNTK F -0.05%
SPWR F -0.04%
LEV F -0.02%
Compare ETFs