CNRG vs. PGJ ETF Comparison
Comparison of SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
CNRG Description
The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho Clean Power Index. Under normal market conditions, the fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index is designed to capture companies whose products and services are driving innovation behind clean power. The fund may invest in equity securities that are not included in the index, cash and cash equivalents or money market instruments, such as repurchase agreements and money market funds. It is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$61.96
Average Daily Volume
18,468
44
PGJ
PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio
PGJ Description
The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.99
Average Daily Volume
67,595
51
Performance
| Period | CNRG | PGJ |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -2.16% | 7.36% |
| 60 Days | -2.44% | 10.93% |
| 90 Days | -1.71% | 21.09% |
| 12 Months | -19.79% | 5.66% |
CNRG Overweight 41 Positions Relative to PGJ
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CEG | A | 4.56% | |
| CMI | C | 3.45% | |
| FSLR | B | 3.29% | |
| AGR | B | 3.07% | |
| GNRC | B | 3.07% | |
| NEE | B | 3.03% | |
| AMAT | C | 2.94% | |
| ED | A | 2.8% | |
| ADTN | F | 2.8% | |
| ENPH | F | 2.75% | |
| ACA | B | 2.74% | |
| AY | B | 2.71% | |
| NJR | B | 2.66% | |
| ALE | A | 2.64% | |
| AES | B | 2.6% | |
| ORA | C | 2.5% | |
| GLW | B | 2.34% | |
| ARRY | D | 2.06% | |
| VMI | B | 2.06% | |
| TSLA | D | 1.94% | |
| SEDG | F | 1.91% | |
| FCEL | F | 1.91% | |
| RUN | D | 1.9% | |
| AMRC | C | 1.89% | |
| EOSE | F | 1.85% | |
| BE | C | 1.83% | |
| EBR | D | 1.71% | |
| SHLS | F | 1.66% | |
| PLUG | F | 1.62% | |
| AMPS | F | 1.36% | |
| AMSC | C | 1.35% | |
| MAXN | F | 1.07% | |
| SPWR | F | 1.05% | |
| TAC | C | 1.03% | |
| HY | D | 0.93% | |
| RNW | C | 0.91% | |
| GEV | A | 0.84% | |
| NOVA | F | 0.83% | |
| ENIC | D | 0.66% | |
| NRGV | F | 0.31% | |
| MNTK | F | 0.27% |
CNRG Underweight 48 Positions Relative to PGJ
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BABA | B | -8.12% | |
| TCOM | A | -7.97% | |
| YUMC | F | -7.34% | |
| BIDU | C | -7.28% | |
| NTES | C | -5.86% | |
| JD | B | -5.2% | |
| TME | A | -4.85% | |
| BEKE | B | -4.44% | |
| ZTO | B | -4.37% | |
| HTHT | B | -3.65% | |
| BZ | A | -3.49% | |
| VIPS | D | -3.25% | |
| YMM | A | -3.25% | |
| NIO | D | -3.15% | |
| TAL | B | -2.88% | |
| LI | F | -2.31% | |
| IQ | B | -1.51% | |
| QFIN | A | -1.5% | |
| MNSO | B | -0.99% | |
| ATHM | C | -0.98% | |
| XPEV | D | -0.96% | |
| BILI | B | -0.89% | |
| HOLI | D | -0.87% | |
| RLX | B | -0.78% | |
| ATAT | C | -0.62% | |
| GOTU | C | -0.58% | |
| MOMO | C | -0.58% | |
| FINV | B | -0.53% | |
| WB | C | -0.47% | |
| ZLAB | F | -0.45% | |
| GDS | C | -0.42% | |
| EH | B | -0.41% | |
| TIGR | D | -0.28% | |
| QD | A | -0.28% | |
| HUYA | B | -0.24% | |
| NOAH | B | -0.24% | |
| SOHU | B | -0.23% | |
| KC | C | -0.15% | |
| VNET | D | -0.14% | |
| LX | D | -0.14% | |
| DADA | D | -0.13% | |
| CAN | F | -0.12% | |
| TUYA | C | -0.12% | |
| DDL | C | -0.11% | |
| API | D | -0.11% | |
| ZH | F | -0.11% | |
| DAO | F | -0.08% | |
| IMAB | F | -0.07% |
CNRG: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
PGJ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
