CANE vs. IHF ETF Comparison

Comparison of Teucrium Sugar Fund ETV (CANE) to iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF (IHF)
CANE

Teucrium Sugar Fund ETV

CANE Description

The investment seeks to replicate, net of expenses, the performance of ICE Sugar Futures Contracts. The fund seeks to have the daily changes in percentage terms of the shares' net asset value (NAV) reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of a weighted average of the closing settlement prices for three futures contracts for sugar that are traded on ICE Futures US, specifically: (1) the second-to-expire Sugar No. 11 Futures Contract, weighted 35%, (2) the third-to-expire Sugar No. 11 Futures Contract, weighted 30%, and (3) the Sugar No. 11 Futures Contract expiring in the March following the expiration month of the third-to-expire contract, weighted 35%.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$12.57

Average Daily Volume

64,973

Number of Holdings *

2

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
IHF

iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF

IHF Description The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. equities in the healthcare providers sector. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index (the "underlying index"), which measures the performance of the healthcare providers sector of the U.S. equity market. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$54.77

Average Daily Volume

66,376

Number of Holdings *

66

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period CANE IHF
30 Days -1.95% -2.34%
60 Days 7.91% -5.49%
90 Days 13.04% -1.84%
12 Months -17.78% 11.05%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in CANE Weight in IHF Overlap
HUM F 10.96% 4.12% 4.12%
CANE Overweight 1 Positions Relative to IHF
Symbol Grade Weight
T C 10.96%
CANE Underweight 65 Positions Relative to IHF
Symbol Grade Weight
UNH B -24.1%
ELV F -11.71%
CI D -7.72%
CVS F -4.77%
VEEV B -4.68%
HCA D -4.3%
CNC F -3.99%
LH B -3.29%
MOH F -3.24%
DGX A -2.85%
THC B -2.65%
UHS D -2.03%
EHC B -1.71%
HQY A -1.39%
ENSG C -1.38%
CHE D -1.37%
DVA C -1.14%
DOCS B -0.89%
RDNT B -0.76%
HIMS B -0.73%
SEM B -0.66%
ACHC F -0.64%
OPCH F -0.64%
GH B -0.58%
CRVL B -0.53%
AMED F -0.52%
EVH F -0.43%
PINC B -0.4%
ASTH F -0.4%
PRVA B -0.38%
ADUS D -0.38%
RCM B -0.37%
SGRY D -0.37%
NEO C -0.33%
TDOC C -0.27%
AMN F -0.26%
NHC B -0.26%
CLOV C -0.25%
USPH C -0.24%
ALHC C -0.23%
MD B -0.22%
PGNY F -0.21%
CERT F -0.2%
PHR D -0.19%
BKD F -0.18%
SDGR C -0.17%
PNTG D -0.16%
LFST B -0.16%
BTSG B -0.16%
CSTL C -0.15%
AGL F -0.14%
HSTM A -0.13%
PACS F -0.12%
CYH D -0.09%
HCAT C -0.09%
SLP D -0.08%
OPK C -0.08%
GDRX F -0.07%
FLGT F -0.07%
CCRN F -0.06%
NRC D -0.05%
DCGO C -0.05%
DH D -0.04%
ACCD F -0.04%
MODV D -0.03%
Compare ETFs