ZIG vs. PYZ ETF Comparison

Comparison of The Acquirers Fund (ZIG) to PowerShares Dynamic Basic Materials (PYZ)
ZIG

The Acquirers Fund

ZIG Description

The investment seeks capital appreciation. The fund is actively managed and seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in equity securities (or depositary receipts) of companies in developed markets outside the United States based on the results of a proprietary, quantitative model (the "EquBot Model") developed by the adviser that runs on the Watson™ platform. Its investment adviser is a technology based company focused on applying artificial intelligence ("AI") based solutions to investment analyses. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$37.23

Average Daily Volume

5,180

Number of Holdings *

29

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PYZ

PowerShares Dynamic Basic Materials

PYZ Description The PowerShares Dynamic Basic Materials Sector Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Basic Materials Sector IntellidexSM Index (Intellidex Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Intellidex Index thoroughly evaluates companies based on a variety of investment merit criteria, including: price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The Underlying Intellidex Index is comprised of stocks of 60 US basic materials companies. These are companies that are principally engaged in the business of producing raw materials, including paper or wood products, chemicals, construction materials, and mining and metals. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$89.95

Average Daily Volume

2,497

Number of Holdings *

50

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period ZIG PYZ
30 Days -0.03% -2.79%
60 Days 3.68% 1.66%
90 Days 9.86% 11.38%
12 Months 35.38% 12.50%
4 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in ZIG Weight in PYZ Overlap
CF F 3.05% 1.67% 1.67%
CMC C 3.24% 1.68% 1.68%
NUE D 2.98% 3.62% 2.98%
STLD D 3.05% 4.31% 3.05%
ZIG Overweight 25 Positions Relative to PYZ
Symbol Grade Weight
WIRE B 4.12%
HCC B 4.01%
VIRT A 3.72%
CNX B 3.71%
MLI B 3.61%
SM B 3.53%
AX A 3.47%
PM B 3.43%
DDS B 3.34%
BSM B 3.33%
ATKR B 3.3%
PHM B 3.3%
MHO C 3.25%
PLTK C 3.24%
CALM D 3.22%
ARCH D 3.21%
CROX D 3.2%
UFPI C 3.2%
FHI F 3.19%
DINO F 3.17%
MO A 3.17%
BTU F 3.16%
MTG C 3.16%
BKE C 3.14%
DHI D 3.13%
ZIG Underweight 46 Positions Relative to PYZ
Symbol Grade Weight
AVY A -4.33%
RS D -3.94%
LYB D -3.75%
LIN D -3.72%
APD C -3.35%
ATI B -3.25%
CRS B -2.67%
WLK B -2.43%
SLVM A -2.37%
RPM D -2.36%
FCX B -2.3%
LPX D -2.28%
CTVA B -2.13%
WOR D -2.11%
CE C -2.08%
DOW D -2.05%
ECL A -2.02%
CBT B -1.99%
SUM D -1.98%
VVV C -1.95%
IFF B -1.9%
OLN D -1.85%
SMG C -1.8%
UEC B -1.75%
IP C -1.7%
FMC D -1.7%
KWR D -1.63%
CLF F -1.63%
ESI D -1.47%
CENX B -1.47%
HWKN A -1.4%
NEU D -1.35%
HUN D -1.33%
FUL C -1.29%
MATV B -1.28%
CC C -1.26%
AVNT A -1.2%
SXC D -1.2%
IOSP C -1.19%
MTRN F -1.13%
KALU A -1.13%
OI F -1.09%
MTX A -1.0%
SCL C -0.93%
PCT F -0.93%
BCPC C -0.89%
Compare ETFs