ZIG vs. PKB ETF Comparison
Comparison of The Acquirers Fund (ZIG) to PowerShares Dynamic Build & Construction (PKB)
ZIG
The Acquirers Fund
ZIG Description
The investment seeks capital appreciation. The fund is actively managed and seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in equity securities (or depositary receipts) of companies in developed markets outside the United States based on the results of a proprietary, quantitative model (the "EquBot Model") developed by the adviser that runs on the Watson™ platform. Its investment adviser is a technology based company focused on applying artificial intelligence ("AI") based solutions to investment analyses. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$42.57
Average Daily Volume
3,326
30
PKB
PowerShares Dynamic Build & Construction
PKB Description
The PowerShares Dynamic Building & Construction Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Building & Construction IntellidexSM Index (Intellidex Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Intellidex Index thoroughly evaluates companies based on a variety of investment merit criteria, including: price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The Underlying Intellidex Index is comprised of common stocks of 30 US building and construction companies. These are companies that are primarily engaged in providing construction and related engineering services for building and remodeling residential properties, commercial or industrial buildings, or working on large-scale infrastructure projects, such as highways, tunnels, bridges, dams, power lines, and airports. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$84.99
Average Daily Volume
19,714
28
Performance
| Period | ZIG | PKB |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 7.34% | 7.03% |
| 60 Days | 10.38% | 7.82% |
| 90 Days | 9.61% | 12.83% |
| 12 Months | 33.84% | 54.51% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in ZIG | Weight in PKB | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPX | B | 3.27% | 2.74% | 2.74% |
ZIG Overweight 29 Positions Relative to PKB
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| UI | B | 5.01% | |
| TPL | A | 4.63% | |
| SYF | B | 3.94% | |
| MLI | B | 3.92% | |
| CALM | A | 3.81% | |
| HCC | B | 3.75% | |
| STLD | B | 3.74% | |
| BTU | B | 3.47% | |
| AMR | C | 3.43% | |
| CRC | A | 3.39% | |
| APAM | B | 3.39% | |
| SLM | A | 3.36% | |
| MO | A | 3.33% | |
| ATKR | D | 3.32% | |
| BK | A | 3.31% | |
| CNS | B | 3.29% | |
| DPZ | C | 3.28% | |
| NUE | C | 3.25% | |
| YUM | D | 3.21% | |
| DDS | B | 3.17% | |
| VRSN | C | 3.12% | |
| CF | A | 3.12% | |
| BCC | B | 3.06% | |
| BPOP | C | 2.94% | |
| PBF | D | 2.89% | |
| BLDR | D | 2.76% | |
| STNG | F | 2.38% | |
| CROX | D | 2.26% | |
| TRMD | F | 2.0% |
ZIG Underweight 27 Positions Relative to PKB
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | A | -5.15% | |
| MLM | C | -5.11% | |
| CSL | C | -4.78% | |
| AGX | B | -4.67% | |
| NVR | D | -4.39% | |
| USLM | A | -4.31% | |
| PHM | D | -4.24% | |
| LEN | D | -3.99% | |
| STRL | A | -3.79% | |
| DHI | F | -3.76% | |
| PRIM | A | -3.42% | |
| TILE | B | -3.32% | |
| MDU | D | -3.25% | |
| APOG | C | -3.06% | |
| MTZ | B | -3.02% | |
| KNF | B | -2.95% | |
| TPC | C | -2.91% | |
| EXP | B | -2.87% | |
| SKY | A | -2.54% | |
| TOL | B | -2.52% | |
| SWX | B | -2.52% | |
| MHO | D | -2.26% | |
| KBH | D | -2.23% | |
| MHK | D | -2.19% | |
| TPH | D | -2.19% | |
| MTH | D | -2.13% | |
| GRBK | D | -2.12% |
ZIG: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
PKB: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
