ZIG vs. AMID ETF Comparison

Comparison of The Acquirers Fund (ZIG) to Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID)

ZIG

The Acquirers Fund

ZIG Description

The investment seeks capital appreciation. The fund is actively managed and seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in equity securities (or depositary receipts) of companies in developed markets outside the United States based on the results of a proprietary, quantitative model (the "EquBot Model") developed by the adviser that runs on the Watson™ platform. Its investment adviser is a technology based company focused on applying artificial intelligence ("AI") based solutions to investment analyses. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$42.57

Average Daily Volume

3,326

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

AMID

Argent Mid Cap ETF

AMID Description

AMID aims to outperform the Russell MidCap Index over the long term by applying Change-Based Investing strategies. The fund actively invests in stocks undergoing positive internal or external change, which the issuer believes could lead to underappreciated growth. The starting universe begins with 1,500 US mid-cap stocks that are screened for liquidity and grouped by sector. Using their proprietary Argent Alpha Model, stocks are ranked under four main categories: Value, Growth, Quality, and Stability. Stocks within each sector with positive exposure to outperforming factors are considered. The remaining companies are grouped into current and future market segments based on expected outperformance in the current or future market cycle. Finally, the fund uses fundamental analysis to select 35-50 stocks with prospect improvements at the company or industry level. Sectors may be overweighted at various times in the economic cycle. Individual securities are capped at 8%.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$36.72

Average Daily Volume

7,812

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	ZIG	AMID
30 Days	7.34%	4.32%
60 Days	10.38%	3.96%
90 Days	9.61%	4.88%
12 Months	33.84%	34.06%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in ZIG	Weight in AMID	Overlap
	BLDR	D	2.76%	3.43%	2.76%

ZIG Overweight 29 Positions Relative to AMID

Symbol	Grade	Weight
UI	B	5.01%
TPL	A	4.63%
SYF	B	3.94%
MLI	B	3.92%
CALM	A	3.81%
HCC	B	3.75%
STLD	B	3.74%
BTU	B	3.47%
AMR	C	3.43%
CRC	A	3.39%
APAM	B	3.39%
SLM	A	3.36%
MO	A	3.33%
ATKR	D	3.32%
BK	A	3.31%
CNS	B	3.29%
DPZ	C	3.28%
LPX	B	3.27%
NUE	C	3.25%
YUM	D	3.21%
DDS	B	3.17%
VRSN	C	3.12%
CF	A	3.12%
BCC	B	3.06%
BPOP	C	2.94%
PBF	D	2.89%
STNG	F	2.38%
CROX	D	2.26%
TRMD	F	2.0%

ZIG Underweight 36 Positions Relative to AMID

Symbol	Grade	Weight
FICO	B	-3.79%
CTAS	B	-3.66%
CPRT	B	-3.56%
FTNT	C	-3.34%
HLI	A	-3.2%
CBZ	B	-2.93%
LPLA	A	-2.87%
CDW	F	-2.86%
VCTR	B	-2.86%
DHI	F	-2.85%
IT	C	-2.83%
MEDP	D	-2.69%
MUSA	B	-2.63%
HCA	F	-2.49%
BAH	F	-2.45%
BLD	D	-2.43%
OMF	A	-2.4%
URI	C	-2.35%
AFG	A	-2.28%
GDDY	A	-2.24%
A	D	-2.12%
ADUS	D	-2.09%
CG	B	-2.05%
SCI	B	-2.05%
TPX	B	-1.99%
AME	A	-1.98%
ICFI	F	-1.93%
LNG	A	-1.69%
CHDN	B	-1.57%
ABG	C	-1.55%
ENTG	D	-1.52%
MOH	F	-1.44%
PATK	C	-1.35%
TTEK	F	-1.33%
AX	B	-1.11%
EXPO	D	-0.99%