UMI vs. GPOW ETF Comparison
Comparison of USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund (UMI) to Goldman Sachs North American Pipelines & Power Equity ETF (GPOW)
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund
UMI Description
The investment seeks a high level of current income; as a secondary objective, the fund seeks capital appreciation. The fund will seek to achieve its investment objectives by investing, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of U.S. and Canadian companies of any market capitalization deemed by the Sub-Adviser to be engaged in the midstream energy sector. It will invest more than 25% of the value of its total assets in the energy, oil, and gas industries. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$40.55
Average Daily Volume
11,181
18
GPOW
Goldman Sachs North American Pipelines & Power Equity ETF
GPOW Description
The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its assets in securities included in its underlying index. The index is designed to deliver exposure to equity securities of U.S. and Canadian listed companies, including companies structured as master limited partnerships, operating in the pipelines and power universe. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$44.81
Average Daily Volume
624
7
Performance
| Period | UMI | GPOW |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 0.08% | -0.41% |
| 60 Days | 4.78% | 6.19% |
| 90 Days | 13.78% | 8.03% |
| 12 Months | 28.55% |
UMI Underweight 1 Positions Relative to GPOW
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| UGI | C | -4.96% |
UMI: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
GPOW: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
