SCAP vs. XMLV ETF Comparison

Comparison of InfraCap Small Cap Income ETF (SCAP) to PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (XMLV)

SCAP

InfraCap Small Cap Income ETF

SCAP Description

The investment seeks to provide total return through long-term capital appreciation and current income. The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing in a diversified group of U.S.-traded equity securities consisting of common and preferred stock, ADRs, and REITs. Under normal circumstances, it invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in small cap securities. The fund's sub-advisor generally defines a small cap company as one having a market capitalization less than the market cap of the largest company in the Russell 2000 Index at the time of acquisition.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$34.72

Average Daily Volume

3,647

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

XMLV

PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio

XMLV Description

The PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is compiled, maintained and calculated by Standard & Poor's, consisting of 80 out of 400 medium-capitalization range securities from the S&P MidCap 400 Index with the lowest realized volatility over the past 12 months. Volatility is a statistical measurement of the magnitude of up and down asset price fluctuations over time. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$60.95

Average Daily Volume

35,673

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	SCAP	XMLV
30 Days	-1.51%	-0.07%
60 Days	-0.99%	1.32%
90 Days	3.77%	5.24%
12 Months		25.68%

7 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in SCAP	Weight in XMLV	Overlap
BRX	C	1.96%	1.16%	1.16%
CHRD	F	1.94%	0.86%	0.86%
GATX	A	1.64%	1.1%	1.1%
JEF	B	1.45%	1.27%	1.27%
NYT	A	1.22%	1.09%	1.09%
POR	C	1.57%	1.17%	1.17%
STAG	D	1.18%	1.12%	1.12%

SCAP Overweight 34 Positions Relative to XMLV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HRI	A	2.95%
EWBC	A	2.78%
AES	F	2.45%
KRC	B	2.22%
MUR	F	2.21%
CASY	A	2.14%
PFBC	B	2.14%
DKL	D	2.1%
SM	F	2.05%
NTB	C	2.03%
AGNC	D	1.97%
PNFP	A	1.96%
REXR	F	1.93%
PAGP	D	1.84%
AVNT	D	1.81%
BLMN	F	1.8%
MKSI	F	1.75%
AB	B	1.74%
WWD	D	1.72%
CELH	F	1.66%
NTST	F	1.58%
EPRT	C	1.56%
MCBS	C	1.51%
SLM	C	1.35%
PK	F	1.29%
AIZ	D	1.18%
ASIX	C	1.16%
CHCT	B	1.12%
WAL	C	1.11%
SBLK	F	1.1%
BPOP	F	1.02%
KRT	C	0.94%
ESI	A	0.93%
VLYPP	B	0.47%

SCAP Underweight 72 Positions Relative to XMLV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ATR	A	-1.79%
CW	B	-1.79%
DTM	A	-1.75%
SEIC	A	-1.72%
CACI	A	-1.63%
VOYA	B	-1.55%
FHI	A	-1.52%
SF	A	-1.48%
EHC	A	-1.47%
IBKR	A	-1.43%
THG	B	-1.39%
ORI	D	-1.39%
AMG	A	-1.38%
PNM	B	-1.38%
DCI	B	-1.38%
RGA	C	-1.37%
INGR	C	-1.37%
AM	C	-1.37%
OHI	B	-1.33%
UNM	A	-1.33%
GLPI	D	-1.32%
HLI	A	-1.32%
OGE	C	-1.31%
ACM	A	-1.31%
ADC	C	-1.31%
IDA	A	-1.31%
FLS	A	-1.3%
SON	F	-1.3%
EPR	D	-1.3%
NJR	D	-1.29%
PRI	B	-1.29%
RLI	B	-1.29%
JHG	A	-1.28%
GNTX	B	-1.28%
RPM	B	-1.27%
USFD	B	-1.26%
SBRA	B	-1.25%
TXRH	A	-1.25%
AFG	D	-1.24%
GGG	D	-1.24%
POST	D	-1.24%
G	C	-1.23%
NWE	D	-1.23%
NNN	D	-1.23%
SR	D	-1.22%
ESNT	F	-1.22%
AVT	B	-1.21%
NFG	C	-1.2%
MTG	D	-1.2%
ELS	D	-1.2%
CDP	B	-1.2%
AMH	F	-1.19%
PPC	A	-1.18%
GEF	B	-1.17%
ALE	A	-1.17%
SNX	C	-1.17%
FLO	F	-1.16%
SLGN	A	-1.16%
KBR	B	-1.15%
EGP	D	-1.14%
CHE	F	-1.14%
OGS	C	-1.13%
FR	D	-1.11%
BKH	D	-1.1%
MMS	D	-1.09%
LSTR	D	-1.09%
MSA	F	-1.07%
DLB	B	-1.04%
NEU	D	-1.04%
WTRG	C	-1.02%
MUSA	C	-0.98%
MAN	F	-0.95%