PCCE vs. IPAY ETF Comparison
Comparison of Polen Capital China Growth ETF (PCCE) to ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY)
PCCE
Polen Capital China Growth ETF
PCCE Description
PCCE aims to deliver sustainable, above-average earnings growth and long-term stock price appreciation within the Chinese equity market. The strategy is rooted in fundamental research, selecting 25-40 Chinese growth companies with a sustainable edge, such as consistent earnings growth, robust balance sheets, and shareholder-oriented management teams. Such companies are selected within industries characterized by high barriers to entry, such as those requiring substantial capital investment, government approvals, or significant intellectual property. Moreover, it integrates ESG factors into the investment process. While the fund may concentrate investments in the consumer discretionary and financial sectors, it avoids over-concentration in any one industry. Investments are typically held for the long term but are subject to periodic review and potential sale based on changing market conditions, company performance, or perceived threats to competitive advantage.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$11.03
Average Daily Volume
2,749
2
IPAY
ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF
IPAY Description
The ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY®) seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Prime Mobile Payments Index. The index provides a benchmark for investors interested in tracking the mobile and electronic payments industry, specifically focusing on credit card networks, payment infrastructure and software services, payment processing services, and payment solutions (such as smartcards, prepaid cards, virtual wallets).Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$61.02
Average Daily Volume
20,503
27
Performance
| Period | PCCE | IPAY |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -5.89% | 12.96% |
| 60 Days | 9.81% | 16.16% |
| 90 Days | 16.57% | 21.02% |
| 12 Months | 48.75% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in PCCE | Weight in IPAY | Overlap |
|---|
PCCE Underweight 27 Positions Relative to IPAY
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PYPL | B | -6.43% | |
| FI | A | -6.42% | |
| TOST | B | -6.23% | |
| V | A | -5.87% | |
| AXP | A | -5.83% | |
| MA | C | -5.65% | |
| COIN | C | -5.19% | |
| DFS | B | -4.96% | |
| SQ | B | -4.84% | |
| CPAY | A | -4.83% | |
| AFRM | B | -4.82% | |
| FIS | C | -4.28% | |
| GPN | B | -4.08% | |
| WEX | D | -3.09% | |
| FOUR | B | -2.91% | |
| ACIW | B | -2.21% | |
| QTWO | A | -2.16% | |
| EEFT | B | -1.91% | |
| WU | D | -1.28% | |
| STNE | F | -1.13% | |
| VYX | B | -0.77% | |
| EVTC | B | -0.66% | |
| MQ | F | -0.64% | |
| PAGS | F | -0.59% | |
| DLO | C | -0.38% | |
| IMXI | B | -0.32% | |
| GDOT | D | -0.26% |
PCCE: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
IPAY: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
