PBW vs. GXC ETF Comparison

Comparison of PowerShares WilderHill Clean Energy Portfolio (PBW) to SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC)

PBW

PowerShares WilderHill Clean Energy Portfolio

PBW Description

The PowerShares WilderHill Clean Energy Portfolio (Fund) is based on the WilderHill Clean Energy Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to deliver capital appreciation through the selection of companies that focus on greener and generally renewable sources of energy and technologies that facilitate cleaner energy. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$21.74

Average Daily Volume

297,315

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

GXC

SPDR S&P China ETF

GXC Description

The investment seeks investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index. The fund employs a sampling strategy in seeking to track the performance of the S&P China BMI Index. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index or in ADRs or GDRs based on securities comprising the index. The index is a market capitalization weighted index designed to define and measure the investable universe of publicly traded companies domiciled in China available to foreign investors. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$73.06

Average Daily Volume

67,944

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	PBW	GXC
30 Days	-3.55%	9.26%
60 Days	-6.45%	12.64%
90 Days	-7.95%	22.42%
12 Months	-34.48%	-3.73%

3 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in PBW	Weight in GXC	Overlap
JKS	D	1.73%	0.04%	0.04%
NIO	D	1.38%	0.27%	0.27%
XPEV	D	1.26%	0.19%	0.19%

PBW Overweight 56 Positions Relative to GXC

Symbol	Grade	Weight
FSLR	B	2.18%
FLNC	B	1.9%
MP	C	1.89%
SLDP	B	1.88%
ORA	C	1.83%
BELFB	B	1.74%
ESE	B	1.71%
ARRY	D	1.7%
AMRC	C	1.69%
FREY	D	1.69%
ITRI	A	1.69%
BE	C	1.66%
PWR	A	1.61%
MYRG	F	1.6%
AEIS	D	1.6%
SLI	C	1.58%
ALB	D	1.57%
PLPC	D	1.56%
THRM	D	1.56%
ENPH	F	1.56%
JOBY	D	1.56%
QS	F	1.56%
TSLA	D	1.56%
WBX	D	1.55%
OLED	C	1.54%
PLL	D	1.52%
SEDG	F	1.46%
AMPS	F	1.45%
SQM	D	1.45%
CSIQ	F	1.44%
WOLF	F	1.43%
AMSC	C	1.41%
BLNK	D	1.38%
RNW	C	1.35%
SES	F	1.33%
RIVN	F	1.32%
LNZA	F	1.31%
ACHR	F	1.3%
STEM	F	1.3%
RUN	D	1.27%
FCEL	F	1.24%
PSNY	F	1.23%
LEV	F	1.23%
ENVX	D	1.21%
NOVA	F	1.2%
NAAS	F	1.16%
NRGV	F	1.13%
PLUG	F	1.13%
CHPT	F	1.12%
SHLS	F	1.11%
EOSE	F	1.08%
AMPX	F	0.96%
SPWR	F	0.95%
SOL	F	0.53%
TPIC	B	0.48%
MAXN	F	0.31%

PBW Underweight 54 Positions Relative to GXC

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BABA	B	-5.8%
PDD	B	-3.61%
BIDU	C	-1.23%
TCOM	A	-1.12%
YUMC	F	-0.68%
LI	F	-0.61%
BEKE	B	-0.43%
BGNE	D	-0.4%
ZTO	B	-0.38%
TME	A	-0.35%
BZ	A	-0.28%
YMM	A	-0.25%
TAL	B	-0.24%
VIPS	D	-0.19%
BILI	B	-0.13%
MNSO	B	-0.11%
LEGN	F	-0.11%
QFIN	A	-0.1%
IQ	B	-0.1%
RLX	B	-0.07%
ATHM	C	-0.07%
YY	C	-0.07%
HOLI	D	-0.06%
DQ	F	-0.05%
MOMO	C	-0.04%
EH	B	-0.04%
GOTU	C	-0.04%
GDS	C	-0.04%
WB	C	-0.03%
NOAH	B	-0.03%
JEWL	F	-0.03%
FINV	B	-0.02%
RERE	B	-0.02%
BLTE	C	-0.02%
QD	A	-0.02%
SOHU	B	-0.02%
HUYA	B	-0.02%
FNGR	C	-0.01%
FANH	F	-0.01%
DDL	C	-0.01%
API	D	-0.01%
CAN	F	-0.01%
NIU	C	-0.01%
IMAB	F	-0.01%
VNET	D	-0.01%
TIGR	D	-0.01%
BTBT	F	-0.01%
DADA	D	-0.01%
ATAT	C	-0.01%
CBAT	B	-0.01%
TUYA	C	-0.01%
ZH	F	-0.01%
LX	D	-0.01%
DAO	F	-0.0%