MEM vs. EEMO ETF Comparison
Comparison of Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (MEM) to PowerShares S&P Emerging Markets Momentum Portfolio (EEMO)
MEM
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF
MEM Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its net assets, which include borrowings for investment purposes, in the common and preferred stocks of companies located in emerging market countries. It seeks to invest in companies capable of sustainable growth based on the fundamental characteristics of those companies, including balance sheet information; number of employees; size and stability of cash flow; management’s depth, adaptability and integrity; product lines; marketing strategies; corporate governance; and financial health.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$33.59
Average Daily Volume
3,052
21
EEMO
PowerShares S&P Emerging Markets Momentum Portfolio
EEMO Description
The investment seeks investment results that generally correspond (before fees and expenses) to the price and yield of the S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap IndexTM. The fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities of companies that comprise the underlying index. The index is composed of stocks that represent the top 85% of float-adjusted market capitalization companies in each emerging country represented in that index. It is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$17.46
Average Daily Volume
3,297
3
Performance
| Period | MEM | EEMO |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 9.54% | 2.15% |
| 60 Days | 11.80% | 3.74% |
| 90 Days | 9.84% | 3.74% |
| 12 Months | 28.13% | 28.15% |
MEM Underweight 0 Positions Relative to EEMO
| Symbol | Grade | Weight |
|---|
MEM: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
EEMO: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
