LGHT vs. TMFS ETF Comparison
Comparison of Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) to Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS)
LGHT
Langar Global HealthTech ETF
LGHT Description
LGHT targets the global healthcare technology industry. The fund actively invests in HealthTech companies, which the adviser defines as firms that develop technology designed to create healthcare efficiency by addressing key pain points for patients, providers, payors, and hospitals, including those companies that derive a majority of their revenue from HealthTech products and services. The portfolio construction starts by identifying companies that fit into the advisers HealthTech definition. The remaining companies are screened using a proprietary metric that assesses each firms financial health, involvement in relevant controversies, as well as the strength of its team and culture. Each company is then assigned an industry risk score through an algorithm that defines quantitative and qualitative risk categories and weights them accordingly. Finally, each company is reviewed by an investment committee. However, the portfolio manager still has full discretion over the final selection.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$10.35
Average Daily Volume
915
31
TMFS
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
TMFS Description
The RBB Fund, Inc. - MFAM Small-Cap Growth ETF is an exchange traded fund launched and managed by Motley Fool Asset Management, LLC. The fund invests in public equity markets of the United States. The fund invests in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. It invests in growth stocks of small-cap companies, within the market capitalization range of the Russell 2000 Growth Index. It employs fundamental and quantitative analysis to create its portfolio. The RBB Fund, Inc. - MFAM Small-Cap Growth ETF was formed on October 29, 2018 and is domiciled in the United States.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$38.07
Average Daily Volume
9,143
34
Performance
Period | LGHT | TMFS |
---|---|---|
30 Days | -1.96% | 10.91% |
60 Days | -2.17% | 14.95% |
90 Days | -1.81% | 15.74% |
12 Months | 39.63% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in LGHT | Weight in TMFS | Overlap |
---|
LGHT Overweight 31 Positions Relative to TMFS
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
ISRG | A | 15.39% | |
GEHC | D | 8.56% | |
RMD | C | 6.71% | |
IQV | F | 6.34% | |
DXCM | C | 5.51% | |
PODD | C | 5.26% | |
VEEV | C | 5.15% | |
PHG | C | 4.87% | |
ZBH | C | 3.57% | |
BNTX | C | 3.53% | |
ALGN | D | 2.85% | |
MASI | B | 2.46% | |
DOCS | C | 2.06% | |
MRNA | F | 1.72% | |
PRCT | B | 1.27% | |
ALKS | C | 0.66% | |
TNDM | D | 0.54% | |
IRTC | C | 0.44% | |
PRVA | C | 0.44% | |
OMCL | C | 0.42% | |
LFST | B | 0.31% | |
TDOC | C | 0.28% | |
PGNY | F | 0.25% | |
EVH | F | 0.22% | |
SDGR | C | 0.21% | |
GDRX | F | 0.2% | |
ALHC | C | 0.2% | |
PHR | F | 0.17% | |
ACCD | D | 0.07% | |
MODV | C | 0.03% | |
TBRG | B | 0.03% |
LGHT Underweight 34 Positions Relative to TMFS
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
GSHD | A | -5.13% | |
AXON | A | -4.97% | |
TOST | B | -4.74% | |
GMED | A | -4.73% | |
QTWO | A | -3.74% | |
ALRM | C | -3.73% | |
SMAR | B | -3.68% | |
GXO | B | -3.68% | |
HRI | C | -3.53% | |
HQY | A | -3.52% | |
RXO | D | -3.51% | |
WSO | A | -3.5% | |
SNEX | B | -3.49% | |
NARI | C | -3.17% | |
LOB | C | -3.06% | |
SITM | B | -3.04% | |
UFPT | C | -2.91% | |
NOG | B | -2.86% | |
RARE | F | -2.79% | |
PEN | B | -2.57% | |
GNTX | C | -2.52% | |
NCNO | C | -2.46% | |
BRBR | A | -2.28% | |
TREX | C | -2.22% | |
STAG | D | -2.07% | |
IPGP | D | -1.82% | |
QXO | D | -1.79% | |
LSTR | D | -1.56% | |
RAMP | B | -1.47% | |
CROX | D | -1.45% | |
FOXF | F | -1.35% | |
DV | C | -1.19% | |
CERT | F | -1.0% | |
WOLF | F | -0.42% |
LGHT: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
TMFS: Top Represented Industries & Keywords