LGHT vs. BAMV ETF Comparison

Comparison of Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) to Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV)
LGHT

Langar Global HealthTech ETF

LGHT Description

LGHT targets the global healthcare technology industry. The fund actively invests in HealthTech companies, which the adviser defines as firms that develop technology designed to create healthcare efficiency by addressing key pain points for patients, providers, payors, and hospitals, including those companies that derive a majority of their revenue from HealthTech products and services. The portfolio construction starts by identifying companies that fit into the advisers HealthTech definition. The remaining companies are screened using a proprietary metric that assesses each firms financial health, involvement in relevant controversies, as well as the strength of its team and culture. Each company is then assigned an industry risk score through an algorithm that defines quantitative and qualitative risk categories and weights them accordingly. Finally, each company is reviewed by an investment committee. However, the portfolio manager still has full discretion over the final selection.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$10.35

Average Daily Volume

915

Number of Holdings *

31

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
BAMV

Brookstone Value Stock ETF

BAMV Description The fund is an actively managed exchange traded fund ("ETF") that invests in companies that the adviser believes offer strong value based on the adviser"s research. Under normal circumstances, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus borrowings for investment purposes) in publicly traded U.S. equity stocks.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$32.54

Average Daily Volume

8,958

Number of Holdings *

30

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period LGHT BAMV
30 Days -1.96% 1.02%
60 Days -2.17% 4.55%
90 Days -1.81% 5.67%
12 Months 24.15%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in LGHT Weight in BAMV Overlap
ZBH C 3.57% 2.62% 2.62%
LGHT Overweight 30 Positions Relative to BAMV
Symbol Grade Weight
ISRG A 15.39%
GEHC D 8.56%
RMD C 6.71%
IQV F 6.34%
DXCM C 5.51%
PODD C 5.26%
VEEV C 5.15%
PHG C 4.87%
BNTX C 3.53%
ALGN D 2.85%
MASI B 2.46%
DOCS C 2.06%
MRNA F 1.72%
PRCT B 1.27%
ALKS C 0.66%
TNDM D 0.54%
IRTC C 0.44%
PRVA C 0.44%
OMCL C 0.42%
LFST B 0.31%
TDOC C 0.28%
PGNY F 0.25%
EVH F 0.22%
SDGR C 0.21%
GDRX F 0.2%
ALHC C 0.2%
PHR F 0.17%
ACCD D 0.07%
MODV C 0.03%
TBRG B 0.03%
LGHT Underweight 29 Positions Relative to BAMV
Symbol Grade Weight
GS A -4.89%
WFC A -4.57%
JPM A -4.4%
FIS C -4.37%
BAC A -4.26%
WELL A -4.14%
PYPL B -3.81%
NEE C -3.73%
XOM B -3.52%
CRM B -3.51%
KR B -3.47%
BRK.A B -3.45%
NEM D -3.39%
OTIS C -3.29%
CSCO B -3.26%
HON C -3.23%
CTSH B -3.2%
CVX A -3.12%
DIS B -3.11%
SBUX A -3.04%
DHR F -2.97%
KO D -2.89%
BDX F -2.81%
CMCSA B -2.69%
PFE F -2.65%
JNJ C -2.65%
CVS D -2.02%
NKE F -2.0%
BA F -1.92%
Compare ETFs