KEMQ vs. IVES ETF Comparison
Comparison of KraneShares FTSE Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) to Wedbush ETFMG Global Cloud Technology ETF (IVES)
KEMQ
KraneShares FTSE Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF
KEMQ Description
The investment seeks to provide investment results that track the price and yield performance of Solactive Emerging Market Consumer Technology Index. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in components of the index, depositary receipts, including ADRs, representing such components and securities underlying depositary receipts in the index. The index is composed of the equity securities of the 50 companies with the largest market capitalization that are headquartered in certain emerging market and frontier countries and engaged in the consumer or technology sectors. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$16.16
Average Daily Volume
2,131
13
IVES
Wedbush ETFMG Global Cloud Technology ETF
IVES Description
The Wedbush ETFMG Global Cloud Technology ETF (IVES) largely holds the “undercover gems” of cloud-based technology. The Fund’s investment objective seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the Dan Ives Global Cloud Technology Prime Index. The Dan Ives Global Cloud Technology Prime Index (the “Index”) is an Index of Prime Indexes, a division of Level ETF Ventures LLC. The Index has been created to provide investors with a reference measure that enables them to track both event-driven news and long-term trends of cloud technology companies. The Index is designed to include the securities of companies across the globe engaged in providing infrastructure, equipment, connectivity, data back-up and storage services as well as data center management for enterprise-based software applications. Additionally, the constituents engaged in providing cloud-based software platforms that enable businesses to move data and software applications onto the cloud – cloud-enabling Software as a Service (SaaS) technologies. These companies are known collectively as “Cloud Technology Companies.”Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$44.59
Average Daily Volume
8,133
46
Performance
| Period | KEMQ | IVES |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 8.27% | -3.53% |
| 60 Days | 13.80% | -5.83% |
| 90 Days | 21.96% | 5.29% |
| 12 Months | 11.68% | 46.21% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in KEMQ | Weight in IVES | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDS | C | 2.25% | 1.86% | 1.86% |
KEMQ Underweight 45 Positions Relative to IVES
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTEX | F | -4.4% | |
| MSTR | D | -3.68% | |
| ESTC | C | -3.65% | |
| NTAP | C | -3.33% | |
| IOT | B | -2.98% | |
| DDOG | C | -2.87% | |
| PSTG | C | -2.85% | |
| NTNX | C | -2.79% | |
| NET | F | -2.64% | |
| SMCI | D | -2.59% | |
| OKTA | D | -2.59% | |
| MDB | F | -2.45% | |
| INFA | D | -1.78% | |
| CFLT | D | -1.7% | |
| GTLB | F | -1.66% | |
| DBX | F | -1.56% | |
| APPF | C | -1.46% | |
| HCP | B | -1.16% | |
| SMAR | D | -0.99% | |
| KC | C | -0.92% | |
| KD | D | -0.88% | |
| CVLT | A | -0.8% | |
| FROG | D | -0.8% | |
| BLKB | B | -0.79% | |
| BOX | F | -0.74% | |
| TDC | F | -0.68% | |
| NCNO | D | -0.64% | |
| DOCN | D | -0.57% | |
| RNG | D | -0.53% | |
| APPN | F | -0.51% | |
| ZETA | A | -0.5% | |
| JAMF | B | -0.47% | |
| NABL | D | -0.43% | |
| INTA | F | -0.43% | |
| PDFS | D | -0.36% | |
| SWI | B | -0.35% | |
| VNET | D | -0.32% | |
| FSLY | F | -0.32% | |
| EVBG | B | -0.27% | |
| GDYN | D | -0.15% | |
| BLZE | D | -0.07% | |
| RXT | C | -0.07% | |
| UIS | C | -0.07% | |
| EGHT | F | -0.06% | |
| DOMO | F | -0.05% |
KEMQ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
IVES: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
