IBLC vs. TGLR ETF Comparison

Comparison of iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) to LAFFER TENGLER Equity Income ETF (TGLR)

IBLC

iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF

IBLC Description

The fund invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of its index and in investments that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the component securities of its index and may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents as well as in securities not included in theindex. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$40.14

Average Daily Volume

18,970

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

TGLR

LAFFER TENGLER Equity Income ETF

TGLR Description

TGLR aims to provide long-term capital appreciation by actively selecting between 25-35 US large-cap stocks. The stocks selected are expected to produce above-market dividend yield with low turnover. The strategy is based on two valuation metrics the sub-adviser believes to be consistent indicators of company value: relative dividend yield and relative price-to-sales ratio. The metrics help determine over- and under valuation, security by security. The sub-adviser then conducts proprietary fundamental factor research to identify stocks for portfolio selection. The research considers both qualitative and quantitative factors such as: catalyst for outperformance, franchise value and market growth, firm management, sales or revenue growth, margins, positive free cash flow, dividend growth, P/E, asset turnover, leverage, and risk. The primary indicator for a stock sell is when the stocks dividend yield is lower than the S&P 500 Index, a sell range is determined.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$30.58

Average Daily Volume

2,293

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	IBLC	TGLR
30 Days	16.92%	1.96%
60 Days	43.98%	4.28%
90 Days	29.68%	6.41%
12 Months	120.74%	29.69%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in IBLC	Weight in TGLR	Overlap

IBLC Overweight 18 Positions Relative to TGLR

Symbol	Grade	Weight
COIN	C	15.68%
MARA	B	10.57%
CLSK	C	9.24%
CORZ	B	9.18%
HUT	C	5.58%
WULF	C	5.29%
RIOT	C	5.13%
CIFR	C	3.77%
NVDA	B	3.39%
APLD	B	2.82%
MA	B	2.59%
IBM	C	2.49%
AMD	F	2.46%
PYPL	B	1.51%
SQ	A	0.89%
HOOD	B	0.36%
FOXA	A	0.18%
DXC	B	0.06%

IBLC Underweight 29 Positions Relative to TGLR

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ORCL	A	-6.11%
AXP	A	-4.89%
AVGO	D	-4.51%
JPM	A	-4.48%
WMT	A	-4.46%
MSFT	D	-4.27%
HD	B	-4.15%
CARR	C	-4.14%
GS	A	-3.92%
MCD	D	-3.87%
RTX	D	-3.65%
ABBV	F	-3.64%
TXN	C	-3.26%
CVX	A	-3.15%
EMR	B	-3.14%
LHX	C	-3.04%
SBUX	A	-2.89%
JNJ	C	-2.82%
STLD	B	-2.8%
EOG	A	-2.77%
GOOGL	C	-2.56%
DELL	B	-2.52%
NXPI	D	-2.51%
AAPL	C	-2.41%
LRCX	F	-2.33%
PLD	F	-2.27%
PEP	F	-2.16%
MDT	D	-2.05%
NEE	C	-1.71%