HELX vs. LRNZ ETF Comparison
Comparison of Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF (HELX) to TrueMark Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ)
HELX
Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF
HELX Description
Seeks capital appreciation by investing in innovative companies related to genomic-based technologies designed to enhance the quality of life. Provides access to companies benefitting from or facilitating the use of new research including DNA sequencing, gene editing and personalized medicine Uses bottom-up fundamental research conducted by dedicated, industry-specific analysts to identify disruptive business models at the right stage for investment Actively managed by a seasoned portfolio management team that is based in Silicon Valley and has a long history of investing in the craft of innovation
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$30.13
Average Daily Volume
668
55
LRNZ
TrueMark Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF
LRNZ Description
LRNZ seeks to provide total return by investing in an actively managed, concentrated portfolio of companies that are significantly involved in the application of high levels of artificial intelligence. Intends to serve as a more focused alpha seeking solution to complement traditional technology-based indices Targets companies with leading-edge artificial intelligence, machine learning, or deep learning technology platforms, algorithms, or applications that we believe may provide distinct competitive advantages in an industry historically characterized by a winner-take-all consolidation behavior. Portfolio construction begins with a multi-cap investment universe comprised of secular growth companies, cyclical growth companies, and newly public companies. Actively managed by highly credentialed artificial intelligence specialist with deep field experience and robust Silicon Valley network.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$36.91
Average Daily Volume
12,941
20
Performance
| Period | HELX | LRNZ |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -8.14% | -5.43% |
| 60 Days | -6.81% | -8.87% |
| 90 Days | 0.55% | -2.88% |
| 12 Months | 2.42% | 44.97% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in HELX | Weight in LRNZ | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDGR | F | 0.53% | 2.98% | 0.53% |
HELX Overweight 54 Positions Relative to LRNZ
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MEDP | C | 7.62% | |
| TMO | B | 4.75% | |
| VRTX | C | 4.72% | |
| REGN | D | 4.59% | |
| KRYS | D | 4.35% | |
| LLY | D | 4.34% | |
| DHR | C | 4.09% | |
| BRKR | D | 3.27% | |
| NTRA | A | 2.99% | |
| AZN | A | 2.51% | |
| CRL | D | 2.42% | |
| CDNS | D | 2.35% | |
| IONS | D | 2.32% | |
| CTVA | C | 2.19% | |
| A | C | 2.17% | |
| RCKT | F | 2.14% | |
| MRNA | B | 2.03% | |
| EXAS | F | 1.99% | |
| QGEN | D | 1.81% | |
| BNTX | F | 1.71% | |
| SRPT | B | 1.57% | |
| ICLR | C | 1.52% | |
| FDMT | D | 1.4% | |
| ALNY | F | 1.33% | |
| NTLA | F | 1.25% | |
| IQV | C | 1.17% | |
| VYGR | F | 1.14% | |
| AZTA | D | 1.07% | |
| RARE | C | 1.0% | |
| RGEN | D | 1.0% | |
| LH | F | 0.96% | |
| TECH | D | 0.87% | |
| CRSP | F | 0.8% | |
| INSM | F | 0.79% | |
| NBIX | C | 0.78% | |
| BMY | F | 0.73% | |
| LGND | D | 0.7% | |
| TWST | C | 0.67% | |
| BEAM | F | 0.66% | |
| BIO | F | 0.66% | |
| BBIO | F | 0.57% | |
| CDMO | D | 0.57% | |
| AVTR | D | 0.52% | |
| UTHR | B | 0.51% | |
| DVAX | F | 0.49% | |
| SLP | B | 0.42% | |
| RXRX | F | 0.36% | |
| ARE | D | 0.31% | |
| DOCS | F | 0.3% | |
| FTRE | D | 0.18% | |
| VCYT | F | 0.14% | |
| OLK | C | 0.12% | |
| TXG | F | 0.11% | |
| PACB | F | 0.04% |
HELX Underweight 19 Positions Relative to LRNZ
HELX: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
LRNZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
