GXC vs. EEMS ETF Comparison
Comparison of SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index Fund (EEMS)
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
GXC Description
The investment seeks investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index. The fund employs a sampling strategy in seeking to track the performance of the S&P China BMI Index. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index or in ADRs or GDRs based on securities comprising the index. The index is a market capitalization weighted index designed to define and measure the investable universe of publicly traded companies domiciled in China available to foreign investors. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$70.53
Average Daily Volume
56,601
57
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index Fund
EEMS Description
The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index. The fund generally invests at least 90% of assets in the securities of the underlying index and in DRs representing securities in the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to measure the performance of equity securities in the bottom 14% of market capitalization of emerging market countries. It concentrates its investments in a particular industry or group of industries to approximately the same extent that the underlying index is concentrated. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$61.21
Average Daily Volume
35,609
22
Performance
| Period | GXC | EEMS |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -5.61% | 0.45% |
| 60 Days | 6.38% | 5.94% |
| 90 Days | 7.38% | 4.78% |
| 12 Months | -2.98% | 17.14% |
15 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in GXC | Weight in EEMS | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DADA | F | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
| DQ | F | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.04% | |
| FINV | C | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.01% | |
| GDS | C | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.04% | |
| HUYA | D | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.02% | |
| JKS | F | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.04% | |
| MOMO | B | 0.04% | 0.07% | 0.04% | |
| NOAH | D | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
| RLX | C | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.06% | |
| TIGR | C | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.01% | |
| TME | B | 0.38% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| TUYA | F | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.01% | |
| VNET | C | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.01% | |
| WB | F | 0.02% | 0.05% | 0.02% | |
| YY | F | 0.06% | 0.09% | 0.06% |
GXC Overweight 42 Positions Relative to EEMS
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BABA | F | 5.56% | |
| PDD | C | 4.05% | |
| TCOM | D | 1.1% | |
| BIDU | F | 1.04% | |
| YUMC | F | 0.55% | |
| LI | F | 0.43% | |
| BEKE | D | 0.43% | |
| BGNE | C | 0.4% | |
| ZTO | C | 0.39% | |
| BZ | C | 0.28% | |
| NIO | F | 0.26% | |
| YMM | B | 0.25% | |
| TAL | F | 0.2% | |
| VIPS | F | 0.18% | |
| XPEV | F | 0.17% | |
| BILI | B | 0.16% | |
| QFIN | B | 0.11% | |
| MNSO | F | 0.1% | |
| LEGN | F | 0.1% | |
| ATHM | D | 0.08% | |
| IQ | F | 0.08% | |
| HOLI | D | 0.06% | |
| JEWL | F | 0.03% | |
| GOTU | D | 0.03% | |
| EH | F | 0.03% | |
| RERE | C | 0.02% | |
| CBAT | C | 0.02% | |
| SOHU | B | 0.02% | |
| BLTE | B | 0.02% | |
| FANH | F | 0.01% | |
| DOYU | B | 0.01% | |
| API | F | 0.01% | |
| NIU | F | 0.01% | |
| CAN | C | 0.01% | |
| IMAB | C | 0.01% | |
| DDL | B | 0.01% | |
| ATAT | C | 0.01% | |
| QD | D | 0.01% | |
| BTBT | C | 0.01% | |
| LX | D | 0.01% | |
| DAO | F | 0.0% | |
| FNGR | F | 0.0% |
GXC: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
EEMS: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
