GK vs. RULE ETF Comparison

Comparison of AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) to Adaptive Core ETF (RULE)
GK

AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF

GK Description

GK seeks to provide a broad thematic exposure by actively investing in a growth-focused portfolio of US companies across a variety of long-term macro trends. It uses a multi-thematic approach to concentrate on disruptive investment themes while ensuring diversification across holdings. In selecting stocks, the fund adviser uses a three-part system which involves fundamental, technical, and qualitative analysis on firms that could benefit from long-term changes in the market. The funds investments may be of any market capitalization and may focus on innovative companies related to renewable energy and sustainable transportation, technology frontiers, video gaming and Esports, cannabis, online gambling, top consumer brands, pet and animal wellness, real estate disruption, healthcare and biotechnology, and the media industry. The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$21.25

Average Daily Volume

4,173

Number of Holdings *

28

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
RULE

Adaptive Core ETF

RULE Description Adaptive Core ETF seeks current income. The fund invests in individual equity securities without regard to market capitalization and ETFs that invest in equity securities of any market capitalization including convertible equity securities and fixed income ETFs. The fund’s portfolio may hold securities from issuers of any market capitalization, credit quality, maturity, or country. Fixed income securities may include securities with credit quality below investment grade (commonly referred to as “junk bond” credit quality).

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$21.66

Average Daily Volume

14,057

Number of Holdings *

34

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period GK RULE
30 Days 7.65% 1.88%
60 Days 8.32% 2.92%
90 Days -3.00% -1.05%
12 Months 28.03% 18.21%
3 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in GK Weight in RULE Overlap
MSFT D 7.47% 2.63% 2.63%
NFLX C 4.88% 2.38% 2.38%
REGN F 2.55% 2.79% 2.55%
GK Overweight 25 Positions Relative to RULE
Symbol Grade Weight
NVDA B 7.8%
AAPL D 6.58%
MGM C 6.31%
LEN C 6.25%
TT A 5.49%
NVO F 5.43%
GOOG C 4.59%
DIS D 4.28%
BX C 3.94%
AMZN C 3.57%
ORCL B 3.27%
AVGO B 3.15%
LPLA C 3.04%
HD A 2.81%
ASML F 2.52%
DELL B 2.46%
VICI C 2.4%
AMD B 1.61%
UBER C 1.49%
MSOS D 1.3%
SYK D 1.1%
ONON B 1.04%
TSLA C 0.67%
GD C 0.6%
ZTS D 0.42%
GK Underweight 31 Positions Relative to RULE
Symbol Grade Weight
BIL B -4.39%
JPST B -4.38%
VEEV D -3.37%
ISRG D -3.2%
MSI A -3.16%
NOW B -3.15%
CRM B -3.13%
META B -3.11%
SPHQ B -3.1%
SPGI C -3.04%
BRO D -3.03%
XLG B -3.03%
FCNCA C -2.98%
BLDR C -2.95%
BAX F -2.89%
IWF C -2.87%
COST D -2.86%
CAH B -2.83%
AON B -2.82%
RMD D -2.76%
INTU F -2.75%
BK A -2.69%
VRSK D -2.63%
CPAY A -2.61%
IRM C -2.6%
URI B -2.56%
WMT C -2.4%
DASH C -2.31%
FTNT B -2.3%
GPN F -2.27%
ADBE F -2.06%
Compare ETFs