EMM vs. ASIA ETF Comparison

Comparison of Global X Emerging Markets ETF (EMM) to Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA)

EMM

Global X Emerging Markets ETF

EMM Description

EMM seeks long-term capital growth by investing in companies believed to be able to achieve and maintain a leading position within their respective country, region, industry, products produce, or services provided. The belief is that emerging markets have the potential for higher levels of growth based on the occurrence of socio-economic changes. Thus, an opportunistic approach to investing in companies considered to be best positioned to benefit from these changes. The funds investable universe is limited to emerging market stocks that meet minimum trading volume and market capitalization requirements. The selection process also considers advantageous-competitive strategies and share-holder beneficial practices and philosophies. The portfolio is constructed using a bottom-up fundamental analysis, subject to a risk management framework. The fund may engage in active and frequent trading. On May 15, 2023, EMM converted from a mutual fund to an actively managed ETF, with $18 million in assets.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.60

Average Daily Volume

6,489

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

ASIA

Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF

ASIA Description

Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its net assets, which include borrowings for investment purposes, in the common and preferred stocks of companies located in Asia excluding Japan, but including all other developed, emerging, and frontier countries and markets in the Asian region.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.08

Average Daily Volume

6,233

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	EMM	ASIA
30 Days	-1.84%	-4.42%
60 Days	-3.41%	0.00%
90 Days	-4.10%	1.71%
12 Months	11.21%	7.16%

6 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in EMM	Weight in ASIA	Overlap
HDB	C	2.0%	2.17%	2.0%
IBN	C	3.2%	2.49%	2.49%
IBN	C	3.2%	0.56%	0.56%
MMYT	B	1.44%	1.03%	1.03%
SHG	D	1.7%	0.5%	0.5%
TSM	B	9.93%	9.13%	9.13%

EMM Overweight 5 Positions Relative to ASIA

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ITUB	F	1.05%
NU	C	0.98%
GFI	D	0.92%
ARCO	F	0.7%
MELI	D	0.57%

EMM Underweight 8 Positions Relative to ASIA

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BABA	D	-3.3%
GRAB	B	-3.03%
SE	B	-2.29%
PDD	F	-1.96%
TCOM	B	-1.04%
BEKE	D	-0.79%
KB	B	-0.7%
BEKE	D	-0.49%