CQQQ vs. KWEB ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim China Technology ETF (CQQQ) to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB)

CQQQ

Guggenheim China Technology ETF

CQQQ Description

The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund's fees and expenses, of an equity index called the AlphaShares China Technology Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its assets in common stock, ADRs, ADSs, GDRs and IDRs that comprise the index and depositary receipts or shares representing common stocks included in the index. The index is designed to measure and monitor the performance of the universe of publicly-traded companies which are based in mainland China, Hong Kong or Macau, are in the Information Technology Sector, as defined by GICS and are open to foreign investment. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$40.56

Average Daily Volume

500,824

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

KWEB

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF

KWEB Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of a specific foreign equity securities benchmark. The fund will normally invest at least 80% of its total assets in equity securities of its current benchmark, the CSI Overseas China Internet Index or in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to measure the performance of the investable universe of publicly traded China-based companies whose primary business or businesses are in the Internet and Internet-related sectors. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$32.16

Average Daily Volume

27,830,621

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	CQQQ	KWEB
30 Days	-12.89%	-16.21%
60 Days	26.75%	25.18%
90 Days	25.07%	25.48%
12 Months	17.46%	24.28%

6 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in CQQQ	Weight in KWEB	Overlap
ATHM	D	1.28%	1.18%	1.18%
BIDU	F	5.68%	3.35%	3.35%
BILI	A	4.42%	3.46%	3.46%
PDD	C	7.72%	6.1%	6.1%
WB	B	0.49%	0.5%	0.49%
YY	D	0.71%	0.68%	0.68%

CQQQ Overweight 1 Positions Relative to KWEB

	Symbol	Grade	Weight
	GDS	B	1.65%

CQQQ Underweight 10 Positions Relative to KWEB

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BABA	B	-9.92%
BEKE	A	-4.7%
TCOM	A	-4.32%
YMM	B	-3.66%
VIPS	F	-3.17%
QFIN	B	-2.99%
TAL	B	-2.92%
TME	D	-2.86%
BZ	C	-2.44%
IQ	C	-0.45%

CQQQ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords

Industries: Internet Content & Information Data Storage Specialty Retail