CNRG vs. XMLV ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) to PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (XMLV)
CNRG

SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

CNRG Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho Clean Power Index. Under normal market conditions, the fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index is designed to capture companies whose products and services are driving innovation behind clean power. The fund may invest in equity securities that are not included in the index, cash and cash equivalents or money market instruments, such as repurchase agreements and money market funds. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$61.96

Average Daily Volume

18,460

Number of Holdings *

44

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
XMLV

PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio

XMLV Description The PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is compiled, maintained and calculated by Standard & Poor's, consisting of 80 out of 400 medium-capitalization range securities from the S&P MidCap 400 Index with the lowest realized volatility over the past 12 months. Volatility is a statistical measurement of the magnitude of up and down asset price fluctuations over time. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$55.50

Average Daily Volume

39,791

Number of Holdings *

79

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period CNRG XMLV
30 Days -2.16% -0.39%
60 Days -2.44% 1.50%
90 Days -1.71% 5.35%
12 Months -19.79% 11.74%
2 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in CNRG Weight in XMLV Overlap
ALE A 2.64% 1.16% 1.16%
NJR B 2.66% 1.35% 1.35%
CNRG Overweight 42 Positions Relative to XMLV
Symbol Grade Weight
CEG A 4.56%
CMI C 3.45%
FSLR B 3.29%
AGR B 3.07%
GNRC B 3.07%
NEE B 3.03%
AMAT C 2.94%
DQ F 2.8%
ED A 2.8%
ADTN F 2.8%
ENPH F 2.75%
ACA B 2.74%
AY B 2.71%
AES B 2.6%
ORA C 2.5%
GLW B 2.34%
ARRY D 2.06%
VMI B 2.06%
JKS D 1.97%
TSLA D 1.94%
SEDG F 1.91%
FCEL F 1.91%
RUN D 1.9%
AMRC C 1.89%
EOSE F 1.85%
BE C 1.83%
CSIQ F 1.81%
EBR D 1.71%
SHLS F 1.66%
PLUG F 1.62%
AMPS F 1.36%
AMSC C 1.35%
MAXN F 1.07%
SPWR F 1.05%
TAC C 1.03%
HY D 0.93%
RNW C 0.91%
GEV A 0.84%
NOVA F 0.83%
ENIC D 0.66%
NRGV F 0.31%
MNTK F 0.27%
CNRG Underweight 77 Positions Relative to XMLV
Symbol Grade Weight
PNM C -1.86%
MDU A -1.68%
ATR A -1.6%
CACI A -1.57%
SEIC C -1.57%
TXRH A -1.51%
DTM B -1.47%
CW A -1.46%
ORI A -1.46%
POST C -1.45%
BWXT D -1.43%
NFG A -1.43%
SNX A -1.43%
IDA B -1.42%
ADC B -1.4%
NNN A -1.4%
INGR C -1.4%
DCI B -1.39%
AM A -1.38%
NWE B -1.38%
OGE A -1.38%
CASY B -1.38%
GLPI F -1.37%
WEN B -1.37%
MUSA D -1.33%
MTG C -1.32%
KBR A -1.32%
ACM A -1.31%
FLO B -1.3%
EHC A -1.3%
SR B -1.29%
POR B -1.28%
AIRC A -1.28%
OGS B -1.27%
BJ C -1.27%
USFD C -1.26%
CHE F -1.25%
MSM F -1.24%
SIGI F -1.24%
AVT A -1.23%
CVLT A -1.21%
WTRG B -1.21%
GHC B -1.21%
RGA A -1.2%
OHI A -1.19%
AFG D -1.18%
BKH B -1.18%
ESNT D -1.17%
GATX C -1.17%
SON D -1.17%
GNTX D -1.17%
SAIC D -1.16%
COLM B -1.16%
THG A -1.15%
LSTR D -1.13%
HLI A -1.13%
DLB D -1.11%
STAG D -1.11%
NBIX A -1.1%
FNF A -1.09%
WPC C -1.07%
FR D -1.07%
NEU D -1.06%
BRX C -1.06%
LECO D -1.06%
PFGC D -1.06%
RS D -1.06%
CHH D -1.05%
EPR D -1.04%
EGP F -1.04%
FHI F -1.02%
ELS D -1.02%
PCH D -1.02%
WH D -1.0%
PRI D -0.99%
G D -0.95%
WERN D -0.9%
Compare ETFs