CHIC vs. KWEB ETF Comparison
Comparison of Global X MSCI China Communication Services ETF (CHIC) to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB)
CHIC
Global X MSCI China Communication Services ETF
CHIC Description
The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the NASDAQ OMX China Technology Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its total assets in the securities of the underlying index and in American Depositary Receipts ("ADRs") and Global Depositary Receipts ("GDRs") based on the securities in the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to track the performance of the technology sector in China. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$12.25
Average Daily Volume
3,430
8
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
KWEB Description
The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of a specific foreign equity securities benchmark. The fund will normally invest at least 80% of its total assets in equity securities of its current benchmark, the CSI Overseas China Internet Index or in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to measure the performance of the investable universe of publicly traded China-based companies whose primary business or businesses are in the Internet and Internet-related sectors. It is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$30.17
Average Daily Volume
19,303,618
16
Performance
Period | CHIC | KWEB |
---|---|---|
30 Days | 4.12% | 11.99% |
60 Days | -10.40% | 16.08% |
90 Days | -13.58% | 30.44% |
12 Months | -24.22% | 14.03% |
CHIC Overweight 0 Positions Relative to KWEB
Symbol | Grade | Weight |
---|
CHIC: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
KWEB: Top Represented Industries & Keywords