AMID vs. ZIG ETF Comparison
Comparison of Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) to The Acquirers Fund (ZIG)
AMID
Argent Mid Cap ETF
AMID Description
AMID aims to outperform the Russell MidCap Index over the long term by applying Change-Based Investing strategies. The fund actively invests in stocks undergoing positive internal or external change, which the issuer believes could lead to underappreciated growth. The starting universe begins with 1,500 US mid-cap stocks that are screened for liquidity and grouped by sector. Using their proprietary Argent Alpha Model, stocks are ranked under four main categories: Value, Growth, Quality, and Stability. Stocks within each sector with positive exposure to outperforming factors are considered. The remaining companies are grouped into current and future market segments based on expected outperformance in the current or future market cycle. Finally, the fund uses fundamental analysis to select 35-50 stocks with prospect improvements at the company or industry level. Sectors may be overweighted at various times in the economic cycle. Individual securities are capped at 8%.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$34.74
Average Daily Volume
7,573
37
ZIG
The Acquirers Fund
ZIG Description
The investment seeks capital appreciation. The fund is actively managed and seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in equity securities (or depositary receipts) of companies in developed markets outside the United States based on the results of a proprietary, quantitative model (the "EquBot Model") developed by the adviser that runs on the Watson™ platform. Its investment adviser is a technology based company focused on applying artificial intelligence ("AI") based solutions to investment analyses. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$38.93
Average Daily Volume
3,059
30
Performance
| Period | AMID | ZIG |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -1.11% | -0.65% |
| 60 Days | -0.43% | 0.41% |
| 90 Days | 5.40% | 3.81% |
| 12 Months | 36.76% | 25.62% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in AMID | Weight in ZIG | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLDR | F | 3.54% | 2.96% | 2.96% |
AMID Overweight 36 Positions Relative to ZIG
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FICO | B | 6.35% | |
| CTAS | B | 3.69% | |
| CDW | F | 3.59% | |
| CPRT | D | 3.33% | |
| DHI | D | 3.28% | |
| HCA | D | 3.08% | |
| HLI | A | 3.02% | |
| FTNT | B | 2.96% | |
| IT | C | 2.86% | |
| MEDP | F | 2.76% | |
| VCTR | A | 2.72% | |
| BAH | A | 2.7% | |
| CBZ | B | 2.59% | |
| BLD | F | 2.59% | |
| MUSA | C | 2.46% | |
| URI | B | 2.41% | |
| ADUS | D | 2.31% | |
| A | D | 2.26% | |
| ICFI | B | 2.21% | |
| AFG | D | 2.21% | |
| CG | B | 2.06% | |
| LPLA | A | 1.91% | |
| TPX | F | 1.82% | |
| OMF | A | 1.79% | |
| AME | A | 1.78% | |
| SCI | A | 1.68% | |
| TTEK | B | 1.64% | |
| ENTG | D | 1.61% | |
| CHDN | B | 1.56% | |
| GDDY | A | 1.54% | |
| LNG | A | 1.53% | |
| PATK | F | 1.44% | |
| ABG | C | 1.42% | |
| MOH | D | 1.35% | |
| EXPO | D | 1.12% | |
| AX | B | 0.95% |
AMID Underweight 29 Positions Relative to ZIG
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CALM | B | -3.89% | |
| UI | A | -3.89% | |
| TPL | A | -3.82% | |
| MLI | A | -3.63% | |
| STLD | A | -3.57% | |
| SYF | B | -3.56% | |
| HCC | A | -3.51% | |
| BK | B | -3.48% | |
| CNS | B | -3.48% | |
| YUM | D | -3.42% | |
| SLM | C | -3.41% | |
| BTU | A | -3.38% | |
| DPZ | B | -3.37% | |
| VRSN | F | -3.37% | |
| CF | B | -3.34% | |
| APAM | A | -3.34% | |
| DDS | C | -3.33% | |
| PBF | F | -3.31% | |
| CRC | B | -3.26% | |
| MO | A | -3.26% | |
| ATKR | F | -3.22% | |
| NUE | F | -3.2% | |
| LPX | D | -3.11% | |
| BCC | D | -3.11% | |
| CROX | F | -3.11% | |
| AMR | F | -3.08% | |
| STNG | F | -2.96% | |
| BPOP | F | -2.92% | |
| TRMD | F | -2.57% |
AMID: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
ZIG: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
