AMID vs. ITB ETF Comparison
Comparison of Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) to iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB)
AMID
Argent Mid Cap ETF
AMID Description
AMID aims to outperform the Russell MidCap Index over the long term by applying Change-Based Investing strategies. The fund actively invests in stocks undergoing positive internal or external change, which the issuer believes could lead to underappreciated growth. The starting universe begins with 1,500 US mid-cap stocks that are screened for liquidity and grouped by sector. Using their proprietary Argent Alpha Model, stocks are ranked under four main categories: Value, Growth, Quality, and Stability. Stocks within each sector with positive exposure to outperforming factors are considered. The remaining companies are grouped into current and future market segments based on expected outperformance in the current or future market cycle. Finally, the fund uses fundamental analysis to select 35-50 stocks with prospect improvements at the company or industry level. Sectors may be overweighted at various times in the economic cycle. Individual securities are capped at 8%.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$36.36
Average Daily Volume
7,800
37
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
ITB Description
The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. equities in the home construction sector. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index (the "underlying index"), which measures the performance of the home construction sector of the U.S. equity market. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$118.82
Average Daily Volume
1,629,710
44
Performance
| Period | AMID | ITB |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 1.27% | -5.90% |
| 60 Days | 1.84% | -6.35% |
| 90 Days | 4.78% | -0.43% |
| 12 Months | 32.32% | 37.10% |
AMID Overweight 34 Positions Relative to ITB
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FICO | A | 3.79% | |
| CTAS | B | 3.66% | |
| CPRT | B | 3.56% | |
| FTNT | B | 3.34% | |
| HLI | A | 3.2% | |
| CBZ | B | 2.93% | |
| LPLA | A | 2.87% | |
| CDW | F | 2.86% | |
| VCTR | B | 2.86% | |
| IT | C | 2.83% | |
| MEDP | F | 2.69% | |
| MUSA | B | 2.63% | |
| HCA | F | 2.49% | |
| BAH | F | 2.45% | |
| OMF | A | 2.4% | |
| URI | B | 2.35% | |
| AFG | A | 2.28% | |
| GDDY | A | 2.24% | |
| A | F | 2.12% | |
| ADUS | D | 2.09% | |
| CG | B | 2.05% | |
| SCI | B | 2.05% | |
| TPX | B | 1.99% | |
| AME | A | 1.98% | |
| ICFI | F | 1.93% | |
| LNG | A | 1.69% | |
| CHDN | B | 1.57% | |
| ABG | B | 1.55% | |
| ENTG | F | 1.52% | |
| MOH | F | 1.44% | |
| PATK | C | 1.35% | |
| TTEK | F | 1.33% | |
| AX | B | 1.11% | |
| EXPO | D | 0.99% |
AMID Underweight 41 Positions Relative to ITB
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEN | D | -11.62% | |
| NVR | D | -7.85% | |
| PHM | D | -7.6% | |
| HD | C | -4.95% | |
| LOW | C | -4.73% | |
| SHW | C | -4.53% | |
| TOL | B | -4.44% | |
| LII | A | -2.89% | |
| OC | A | -2.44% | |
| MAS | D | -2.4% | |
| TMHC | C | -2.06% | |
| MTH | D | -1.84% | |
| KBH | D | -1.6% | |
| FND | D | -1.54% | |
| SKY | A | -1.49% | |
| EXP | B | -1.46% | |
| IBP | D | -1.37% | |
| FBIN | D | -1.32% | |
| MHO | D | -1.22% | |
| UFPI | C | -1.13% | |
| CVCO | A | -1.11% | |
| TPH | D | -1.11% | |
| SSD | D | -1.09% | |
| TREX | C | -1.06% | |
| MHK | D | -1.03% | |
| BECN | B | -0.98% | |
| AZEK | B | -0.97% | |
| CCS | F | -0.67% | |
| LGIH | F | -0.6% | |
| GRBK | D | -0.6% | |
| LEN | D | -0.51% | |
| HAYW | B | -0.33% | |
| MBC | F | -0.3% | |
| BZH | C | -0.26% | |
| DFH | F | -0.22% | |
| LEG | F | -0.22% | |
| AMWD | B | -0.21% | |
| NX | C | -0.2% | |
| JELD | F | -0.12% | |
| ETD | D | -0.1% | |
| ARHS | D | -0.07% |
AMID: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
ITB: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
