AMID vs. HACK ETF Comparison
Comparison of Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) to ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK)
AMID
Argent Mid Cap ETF
AMID Description
AMID aims to outperform the Russell MidCap Index over the long term by applying Change-Based Investing strategies. The fund actively invests in stocks undergoing positive internal or external change, which the issuer believes could lead to underappreciated growth. The starting universe begins with 1,500 US mid-cap stocks that are screened for liquidity and grouped by sector. Using their proprietary Argent Alpha Model, stocks are ranked under four main categories: Value, Growth, Quality, and Stability. Stocks within each sector with positive exposure to outperforming factors are considered. The remaining companies are grouped into current and future market segments based on expected outperformance in the current or future market cycle. Finally, the fund uses fundamental analysis to select 35-50 stocks with prospect improvements at the company or industry level. Sectors may be overweighted at various times in the economic cycle. Individual securities are capped at 8%.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$36.94
Average Daily Volume
7,659
37
HACK
ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF
HACK Description
The investment seeks investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the Prime Cyber Defense Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its total assets in the component securities of the index and in ADRs and GDRs based on the component securities in the index. The index tracks the performance of the exchange-listed equity securities of companies across the globe that (i) engage in providing cybersecurity applications or services as a vital component of its overall business or (ii) provide hardware or software for cybersecurity activities as a vital component of its overall business.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$73.26
Average Daily Volume
65,380
23
Performance
Period | AMID | HACK |
---|---|---|
30 Days | 3.47% | 4.04% |
60 Days | 7.76% | 12.67% |
90 Days | 9.34% | 13.16% |
12 Months | 37.26% | 35.93% |
AMID Overweight 35 Positions Relative to HACK
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
CTAS | A | 3.66% | |
FICO | B | 3.52% | |
CPRT | A | 3.43% | |
BLDR | D | 3.36% | |
CDW | F | 3.18% | |
HLI | B | 3.16% | |
DHI | F | 2.9% | |
CBZ | B | 2.89% | |
VCTR | B | 2.83% | |
IT | A | 2.82% | |
MEDP | C | 2.81% | |
LPLA | B | 2.75% | |
HCA | D | 2.54% | |
MUSA | B | 2.51% | |
BLD | F | 2.47% | |
URI | B | 2.36% | |
OMF | A | 2.35% | |
A | F | 2.25% | |
ADUS | D | 2.19% | |
GDDY | A | 2.13% | |
AFG | A | 2.13% | |
SCI | B | 2.08% | |
CG | C | 2.08% | |
ICFI | C | 2.08% | |
TPX | B | 1.94% | |
AME | A | 1.91% | |
CHDN | C | 1.61% | |
LNG | B | 1.6% | |
ENTG | D | 1.6% | |
MOH | F | 1.58% | |
TTEK | C | 1.53% | |
ABG | B | 1.52% | |
PATK | D | 1.29% | |
AX | B | 1.09% | |
EXPO | D | 1.03% |
AMID Underweight 21 Positions Relative to HACK
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
AVGO | C | -10.24% | |
CSCO | A | -7.53% | |
PANW | A | -6.1% | |
CRWD | B | -5.71% | |
GD | A | -5.34% | |
NOC | C | -5.08% | |
LDOS | B | -4.59% | |
NET | B | -4.18% | |
FFIV | A | -3.71% | |
GEN | A | -3.69% | |
ZS | B | -3.58% | |
CYBR | B | -3.38% | |
S | B | -3.31% | |
CHKP | D | -3.24% | |
QLYS | B | -3.19% | |
OKTA | C | -3.11% | |
VRNS | D | -2.59% | |
RBRK | B | -2.55% | |
TENB | C | -2.55% | |
RPD | C | -2.31% | |
FSLY | D | -2.21% |
AMID: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
HACK: Top Represented Industries & Keywords