AMID vs. GSFP ETF Comparison
Comparison of Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) to Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF (GSFP)
AMID
Argent Mid Cap ETF
AMID Description
AMID aims to outperform the Russell MidCap Index over the long term by applying Change-Based Investing strategies. The fund actively invests in stocks undergoing positive internal or external change, which the issuer believes could lead to underappreciated growth. The starting universe begins with 1,500 US mid-cap stocks that are screened for liquidity and grouped by sector. Using their proprietary Argent Alpha Model, stocks are ranked under four main categories: Value, Growth, Quality, and Stability. Stocks within each sector with positive exposure to outperforming factors are considered. The remaining companies are grouped into current and future market segments based on expected outperformance in the current or future market cycle. Finally, the fund uses fundamental analysis to select 35-50 stocks with prospect improvements at the company or industry level. Sectors may be overweighted at various times in the economic cycle. Individual securities are capped at 8%.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$36.72
Average Daily Volume
7,812
37
GSFP
Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF
GSFP Description
The fund invests, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets plus any borrowings for investment purposes in equity investments in U.S. and non-U.S. companies that Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P. (GSAM or the Investment Adviser) believes are associated, at the time the investment is first added to the fund's portfolio, with seeking to address environmental problems. It may have significant exposure to specific sectors including, but not limited to, the industrials, materials and technology sectors. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$32.30
Average Daily Volume
886
21
Performance
| Period | AMID | GSFP |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 4.32% | -0.31% |
| 60 Days | 3.96% | -0.30% |
| 90 Days | 4.88% | 0.42% |
| 12 Months | 34.06% | 18.33% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in AMID | Weight in GSFP | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLD | D | 2.43% | 2.19% | 2.19% |
AMID Overweight 36 Positions Relative to GSFP
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FICO | B | 3.79% | |
| CTAS | B | 3.66% | |
| CPRT | B | 3.56% | |
| BLDR | D | 3.43% | |
| FTNT | C | 3.34% | |
| HLI | A | 3.2% | |
| CBZ | B | 2.93% | |
| LPLA | A | 2.87% | |
| CDW | F | 2.86% | |
| VCTR | B | 2.86% | |
| DHI | F | 2.85% | |
| IT | C | 2.83% | |
| MEDP | D | 2.69% | |
| MUSA | B | 2.63% | |
| HCA | F | 2.49% | |
| BAH | F | 2.45% | |
| OMF | A | 2.4% | |
| URI | C | 2.35% | |
| AFG | A | 2.28% | |
| GDDY | A | 2.24% | |
| A | D | 2.12% | |
| ADUS | D | 2.09% | |
| CG | B | 2.05% | |
| SCI | B | 2.05% | |
| TPX | B | 1.99% | |
| AME | A | 1.98% | |
| ICFI | F | 1.93% | |
| LNG | A | 1.69% | |
| CHDN | B | 1.57% | |
| ABG | C | 1.55% | |
| ENTG | D | 1.52% | |
| MOH | F | 1.44% | |
| PATK | C | 1.35% | |
| TTEK | F | 1.33% | |
| AX | B | 1.11% | |
| EXPO | D | 0.99% |
AMID Underweight 20 Positions Relative to GSFP
AMID: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
GSFP: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
