ZIG vs. PXJ ETF Comparison
Comparison of The Acquirers Fund (ZIG) to PowerShares Dynamic Oil Services (PXJ)
ZIG
The Acquirers Fund
ZIG Description
The investment seeks capital appreciation. The fund is actively managed and seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in equity securities (or depositary receipts) of companies in developed markets outside the United States based on the results of a proprietary, quantitative model (the "EquBot Model") developed by the adviser that runs on the Watson™ platform. Its investment adviser is a technology based company focused on applying artificial intelligence ("AI") based solutions to investment analyses. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$42.57
Average Daily Volume
3,326
30
PXJ
PowerShares Dynamic Oil Services
PXJ Description
The PowerShares Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Oil & Gas Services IntellidexSM Index (Intellidex Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Intellidex Index thoroughly evaluates companies based on a variety of investment merit criteria, including: price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The Underlying Intellidex Index is composed of stocks of 30 U.S. companies that assist in the production, processing and distribution of oil and gas. The Underlying Intellidex Index may include companies that are engaged in the drilling of oil and gas wells; manufacturing oil and gas field machinery and equipment; or providing services to the oil and gas industry, such as well analysis, platform and pipeline engineering and construction, logistics and transportation services, oil and gas well emergency management and geophysical data acquisition and processing. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$30.16
Average Daily Volume
24,235
28
Performance
| Period | ZIG | PXJ |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 7.34% | 7.52% |
| 60 Days | 10.38% | 1.80% |
| 90 Days | 9.61% | -0.92% |
| 12 Months | 33.84% | 7.65% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in ZIG | Weight in PXJ | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STNG | F | 2.38% | 2.2% | 2.2% |
ZIG Overweight 29 Positions Relative to PXJ
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| UI | B | 5.01% | |
| TPL | A | 4.63% | |
| SYF | B | 3.94% | |
| MLI | B | 3.92% | |
| CALM | A | 3.81% | |
| HCC | B | 3.75% | |
| STLD | B | 3.74% | |
| BTU | B | 3.47% | |
| AMR | C | 3.43% | |
| CRC | A | 3.39% | |
| APAM | B | 3.39% | |
| SLM | A | 3.36% | |
| MO | A | 3.33% | |
| ATKR | D | 3.32% | |
| BK | A | 3.31% | |
| CNS | B | 3.29% | |
| DPZ | C | 3.28% | |
| LPX | B | 3.27% | |
| NUE | C | 3.25% | |
| YUM | D | 3.21% | |
| DDS | B | 3.17% | |
| VRSN | C | 3.12% | |
| CF | A | 3.12% | |
| BCC | B | 3.06% | |
| BPOP | C | 2.94% | |
| PBF | D | 2.89% | |
| BLDR | D | 2.76% | |
| CROX | D | 2.26% | |
| TRMD | F | 2.0% |
ZIG Underweight 27 Positions Relative to PXJ
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BKR | A | -6.39% | |
| FTI | A | -5.59% | |
| SLB | C | -5.07% | |
| HAL | C | -5.06% | |
| PTEN | C | -4.72% | |
| NOV | C | -4.7% | |
| WFRD | D | -4.07% | |
| WTTR | A | -3.51% | |
| AROC | A | -3.4% | |
| WHD | B | -3.12% | |
| USAC | B | -3.02% | |
| TDW | F | -2.99% | |
| CLB | B | -2.98% | |
| OII | B | -2.91% | |
| HP | C | -2.88% | |
| DHT | F | -2.86% | |
| ACDC | B | -2.85% | |
| NVGS | D | -2.8% | |
| VTOL | B | -2.77% | |
| PUMP | C | -2.76% | |
| RES | D | -2.63% | |
| NBR | C | -2.61% | |
| HLX | B | -2.58% | |
| LBRT | D | -2.48% | |
| INSW | F | -2.41% | |
| ECO | F | -2.28% | |
| LPG | F | -2.0% |
ZIG: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
PXJ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
