SETM vs. PWER ETF Comparison

Comparison of Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) to Macquarie Energy Transition ETF (PWER)
SETM

Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF

SETM Description

The fund invests at least 80% of its total assets in securities of the index. The index is designed to track the performance of companies that derive at least 50% of their revenue and/or assets from (i) mining, exploration, development, production, recycling, refining, or smelting of energy transition materials; (ii) investments in energy transition materials that represent all or a significant portion of their assets. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$17.88

Average Daily Volume

10,372

Number of Holdings *

5

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PWER

Macquarie Energy Transition ETF

PWER Description The ETF seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in a diversified portfolio of securities in the energy, materials, industrial, renewable energy, and utilities sectors that meet the fund"s investment criteria.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$28.41

Average Daily Volume

320

Number of Holdings *

6

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period SETM PWER
30 Days -7.17% -5.95%
60 Days -5.20% 0.69%
90 Days -0.42% 6.07%
12 Months 1.53%
2 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in SETM Weight in PWER Overlap
FCX C 5.58% 3.81% 3.81%
MP D 4.04% 4.04% 4.04%
Compare ETFs