RUNN vs. PRN ETF Comparison

Comparison of Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) to PowerShares Dynamic Industrials (PRN)

RUNN

Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF

RUNN Description

The fund is in an actively managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF"). Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in exchange-traded equity securities of large and mid-sized U.S. companies with market capitalizations of at least $5 billion. The fund is roughly equally-weighted with 50-75 stocks typically held in the portfolio. The fund may invest up to 20% of net assets in non-U.S. companies. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$34.75

Average Daily Volume

42,347

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PRN

PowerShares Dynamic Industrials

PRN Description

The PowerShares Dynamic Industrials Sector Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Industrials Sector IntellidexSM Index (Intellidex Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Intellidex Index thoroughly evaluates companies based on a variety of investment merit criteria, including: price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The Underlying Intellidex Index is comprised of common stocks of 60 US industrial companies. These are companies that are principally engaged in the business of providing industrial products and services, including engineering heavy machinery, construction, electrical equipment, aerospace and defense and general manufacturing. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$175.23

Average Daily Volume

18,897

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RUNN	PRN
30 Days	2.63%	9.86%
60 Days	5.02%	16.00%
90 Days	6.99%	21.81%
12 Months	30.86%	62.90%

7 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RUNN	Weight in PRN	Overlap
CSL	C	1.72%	2.43%	1.72%
FI	A	1.85%	2.85%	1.85%
GWW	B	1.83%	3.68%	1.83%
ITT	A	1.83%	1.45%	1.45%
PH	A	1.85%	3.52%	1.85%
RSG	A	1.74%	2.04%	1.74%
WSO	A	1.86%	3.68%	1.86%

RUNN Overweight 48 Positions Relative to PRN

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HON	C	1.9%
J	D	1.86%
CW	C	1.86%
FDS	B	1.86%
AME	A	1.86%
ETN	A	1.86%
PRI	B	1.85%
TXRH	B	1.84%
LDOS	C	1.83%
TDY	B	1.83%
EME	A	1.82%
RBA	A	1.82%
ADP	A	1.82%
BSX	A	1.82%
V	A	1.82%
BR	A	1.81%
SYK	B	1.8%
SAIA	B	1.79%
ACN	B	1.79%
BRO	B	1.78%
DRI	B	1.78%
NSC	B	1.77%
GD	D	1.76%
IR	B	1.75%
DECK	A	1.75%
GGG	B	1.74%
FELE	B	1.74%
CACI	D	1.74%
GOOG	C	1.72%
APD	A	1.72%
SSNC	B	1.71%
TSCO	D	1.71%
NVT	B	1.71%
TJX	A	1.71%
ROP	B	1.7%
AJG	A	1.68%
UNH	B	1.68%
TTC	C	1.68%
CI	D	1.67%
DOX	D	1.65%
STE	D	1.64%
MMC	B	1.64%
BDX	F	1.63%
ICE	C	1.6%
AVY	F	1.59%
FCN	F	1.57%
IQV	F	1.55%
ICLR	D	1.52%

RUNN Underweight 33 Positions Relative to PRN

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SMR	B	-5.12%
FIX	A	-4.0%
PWR	A	-3.83%
HEI	A	-3.58%
AXON	A	-3.45%
TT	A	-3.33%
CTAS	B	-3.17%
HWM	A	-3.08%
URI	C	-3.08%
PKG	A	-2.88%
STRL	A	-2.85%
IRM	C	-2.41%
TDG	D	-2.31%
CSWI	B	-2.25%
DY	D	-2.16%
EXP	B	-2.01%
GE	D	-2.0%
CARR	C	-1.98%
MLI	B	-1.96%
GVA	A	-1.94%
BAH	F	-1.83%
LMB	B	-1.81%
AIT	B	-1.78%
ROAD	B	-1.71%
KAI	B	-1.63%
CLH	C	-1.5%
TTEK	F	-1.49%
TPC	C	-1.45%
VSEC	C	-1.44%
UFPI	C	-1.4%
CECO	B	-1.33%
RUSHA	C	-1.32%
FWRD	D	-1.31%