RSPR vs. CGRO ETF Comparison

Comparison of Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) to CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO)

RSPR

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF

RSPR Description

The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index is composed of all of the components of the S&P 500® Real Estate Index, an index that contains the common stocks of all companies included in the S&P 500® Index that are classified as members of the real estate sector, as defined according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS).

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$37.54

Average Daily Volume

15,413

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

CGRO

CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF

CGRO Description

CGRO aims to benefit from high-growth sectors in Greater China without compromising American values and interests. The fund includes companies of all sizes located or primarily traded in mainland China, Taiwan, and Chinas special administrative regions, such as Hong Kong. The portfolio construction starts with top-down macro research, which utilizes publicly available data to identify sectors with the highest growth potential. The fund also conducts on-the-ground due diligence wherein it gains insights from 15 investment professionals located in China. Lastly, a fundamental bottom-up approach is used to analyze company-specific data such as financial reports and management expertise. The weight of each sector and company is determined by the sub-advisers assessment of its growth potential, which may change over time. The fund may invest in China A-shares, depositary receipts, and issuers listed on exchanges outside China.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$22.99

Average Daily Volume

743

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RSPR	CGRO
30 Days	0.09%	-4.14%
60 Days	-0.46%	15.18%
90 Days	2.47%	17.48%
12 Months	29.00%	12.82%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in RSPR	Weight in CGRO	Overlap

RSPR Overweight 31 Positions Relative to CGRO

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CBRE	B	3.8%
DLR	B	3.72%
SPG	A	3.63%
WELL	A	3.46%
EQIX	A	3.44%
KIM	A	3.43%
HST	C	3.43%
AVB	B	3.3%
REG	A	3.29%
VTR	B	3.29%
IRM	C	3.29%
BXP	C	3.29%
CPT	B	3.26%
ESS	B	3.25%
MAA	B	3.23%
FRT	B	3.23%
DOC	C	3.19%
UDR	B	3.19%
CSGP	D	3.19%
EQR	C	3.18%
WY	F	3.16%
PSA	C	3.1%
VICI	C	3.06%
EXR	C	3.06%
INVH	D	3.04%
O	C	3.01%
SBAC	D	2.99%
PLD	F	2.98%
ARE	F	2.91%
CCI	C	2.87%
AMT	C	2.72%

RSPR Underweight 10 Positions Relative to CGRO

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PDD	F	-9.47%
TCOM	B	-7.4%
BEKE	D	-4.55%
BABA	D	-3.58%
YMM	C	-2.97%
TME	D	-2.54%
BIDU	F	-2.08%
LI	F	-1.17%
BILI	D	-0.91%
NTES	D	-0.35%