RMIF vs. BAMU ETF Comparison
Comparison of ETF Series Solutions LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF (RMIF) to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU)
RMIF
ETF Series Solutions LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF
RMIF Description
The fund is an actively-managed "fund of funds" and seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in other investment companies, including other actively managed exchange-traded funds ("ETFs") and index-based ETFs (collectively, "Underlying Investments"), that provide exposure to a broad range of fixed income asset classes. The fund may also invest in cash, cash equivalents, or money market funds.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$25.16
Average Daily Volume
2,492
5
BAMU
Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF
BAMU Description
The fund is an actively managed exchange traded fund ("ETF") that, under normal circumstances, invests at least 80% of its net assets in U.S. Treasuries and investment grade corporate bonds with a 0-2 year maturity range, including unaffiliated ETFs purchased in the secondary market that invest substantially all of their assets in such fixed income instruments.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$25.38
Average Daily Volume
8,187
5
Performance
Period | RMIF | BAMU |
---|---|---|
30 Days | 0.84% | 0.33% |
60 Days | 0.92% | 0.75% |
90 Days | 1.98% | 1.06% |
12 Months |
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in RMIF | Weight in BAMU | Overlap |
---|
RMIF: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
BAMU: Top Represented Industries & Keywords