PJFM vs. AMID ETF Comparison

Comparison of PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF (PJFM) to Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID)

PJFM

PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF

PJFM Description

Under normal circumstances, the fund invests at least 80% of the fund's investable assets in equity and equity-related securities of medium-sized companies. The subadviser uses a combination of fundamental research and systematic portfolio construction. The fund's managers consider medium-sized companies to be those with market capitalizations that are within the market capitalization range of the Russell Midcap Index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$57.51

Average Daily Volume

161

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

AMID

Argent Mid Cap ETF

AMID Description

AMID aims to outperform the Russell MidCap Index over the long term by applying Change-Based Investing strategies. The fund actively invests in stocks undergoing positive internal or external change, which the issuer believes could lead to underappreciated growth. The starting universe begins with 1,500 US mid-cap stocks that are screened for liquidity and grouped by sector. Using their proprietary Argent Alpha Model, stocks are ranked under four main categories: Value, Growth, Quality, and Stability. Stocks within each sector with positive exposure to outperforming factors are considered. The remaining companies are grouped into current and future market segments based on expected outperformance in the current or future market cycle. Finally, the fund uses fundamental analysis to select 35-50 stocks with prospect improvements at the company or industry level. Sectors may be overweighted at various times in the economic cycle. Individual securities are capped at 8%.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$34.74

Average Daily Volume

7,573

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	PJFM	AMID
30 Days	2.31%	-1.11%
60 Days	4.14%	-0.43%
90 Days	7.73%	5.40%
12 Months		36.76%

5 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in PJFM	Weight in AMID	Overlap
CHDN	B	3.9%	1.56%	1.56%
ENTG	D	1.36%	1.61%	1.36%
LNG	A	2.04%	1.53%	1.53%
LPLA	A	1.22%	1.91%	1.22%
MOH	D	1.16%	1.35%	1.16%

PJFM Overweight 37 Positions Relative to AMID

Symbol	Grade	Weight
FOUR	B	4.63%
NI	B	4.14%
GLPI	D	4.04%
MKL	D	3.68%
CCK	B	3.62%
TRGP	A	3.56%
RL	B	3.05%
EWBC	A	2.93%
HLT	A	2.89%
BURL	D	2.84%
WTFC	B	2.78%
LHX	A	2.53%
KEX	D	2.38%
AXS	C	2.37%
KBR	B	2.33%
PR	F	2.27%
GNRC	A	2.26%
CBRE	A	2.25%
CYBR	C	2.1%
LFUS	D	2.06%
RNR	C	1.94%
PINS	C	1.91%
ALSN	A	1.9%
IRT	D	1.83%
GTES	A	1.74%
MNDY	A	1.61%
PFGC	B	1.59%
NBIX	C	1.56%
CMS	C	1.56%
NTRA	B	1.5%
VRT	B	1.38%
RYAN	C	1.14%
OLED	F	1.12%
ESNT	F	1.01%
COHR	B	1.01%
HEI	D	0.9%
PCVX	C	0.74%

PJFM Underweight 32 Positions Relative to AMID

Symbol	Grade	Weight
FICO	B	-6.35%
CTAS	B	-3.69%
CDW	F	-3.59%
BLDR	F	-3.54%
CPRT	D	-3.33%
DHI	D	-3.28%
HCA	D	-3.08%
HLI	A	-3.02%
FTNT	B	-2.96%
IT	C	-2.86%
MEDP	F	-2.76%
VCTR	A	-2.72%
BAH	A	-2.7%
CBZ	B	-2.59%
BLD	F	-2.59%
MUSA	C	-2.46%
URI	B	-2.41%
ADUS	D	-2.31%
A	D	-2.26%
ICFI	B	-2.21%
AFG	D	-2.21%
CG	B	-2.06%
TPX	F	-1.82%
OMF	A	-1.79%
AME	A	-1.78%
SCI	A	-1.68%
TTEK	B	-1.64%
GDDY	A	-1.54%
PATK	F	-1.44%
ABG	C	-1.42%
EXPO	D	-1.12%
AX	B	-0.95%