PAWZ vs. JHMU ETF Comparison
Comparison of ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) to John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU)
PAWZ
ProShares Pet Care ETF
PAWZ Description
The investment seeks investment results, before fees and expenses, that track the performance of the FactSet Pet Care EW Index (the "index"). The fund seeks to invest substantially all of its assets in the stocks that make up the index. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in the component securities of the index. The index consists of U.S. and international companies that potentially stand to benefit from interest in, resources spent on, pet ownership. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$57.19
Average Daily Volume
3,068
17
JHMU
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF
JHMU Description
The fund normally invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities that compose the fund's index. The index is designed to comprise securities in the utilities sector within the U.S. Universe whose market capitalizations are larger than that of the 1001st largest U.S. company at the time of reconstitution. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.58
Average Daily Volume
3,463
10
Performance
| Period | PAWZ | JHMU |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -0.33% | 0.87% |
| 60 Days | -3.82% | -0.33% |
| 90 Days | -0.60% | 0.19% |
| 12 Months | 22.58% | 8.04% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in PAWZ | Weight in JHMU | Overlap |
|---|
PAWZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
JHMU: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
