MFEM vs. GEM ETF Comparison

Comparison of PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) to Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM)
MFEM

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF

MFEM Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results of the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Index. The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its total assets (exclusive of collateral held from securities lending) in the component securities of the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Index. The underlying index is constructed by RAFI Indices, LLC using a rules-based approach to construct factor portfolios within the underlying index. The underlying index consists of factor portfolios, each of which emphasizes one of the following factors: value, low volatility, quality and momentum.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$19.65

Average Daily Volume

11,427

Number of Holdings *

23

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
GEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

GEM Description The investment seeks to provide investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Emerging Markets Equity Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its assets (exclusive of collateral held from securities lending) in securities included in its underlying index, in depositary receipts representing securities included in its underlying index and in underlying stocks in respect of depositary receipts included in its underlying index. The index is designed to deliver exposure to equity securities of emerging market issuers.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$33.16

Average Daily Volume

68,074

Number of Holdings *

40

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period MFEM GEM
30 Days -2.92% -3.80%
60 Days -0.81% -1.37%
90 Days -1.06% -1.13%
12 Months 12.05% 12.15%
15 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in MFEM Weight in GEM Overlap
BCH F 0.16% 0.09% 0.09%
BRFS D 0.13% 0.04% 0.04%
CHT D 0.4% 0.06% 0.06%
GGB C 0.15% 0.09% 0.09%
KB B 0.42% 0.27% 0.27%
KEP B 0.32% 0.04% 0.04%
KT A 0.33% 0.09% 0.09%
LPL F 0.13% 0.04% 0.04%
PDD F 0.25% 0.75% 0.25%
SHG D 0.68% 0.2% 0.2%
SKM D 0.27% 0.22% 0.22%
TME D 0.46% 0.1% 0.1%
VALE F 0.54% 0.41% 0.41%
VIPS F 0.23% 0.2% 0.2%
YUMC C 0.1% 0.24% 0.1%
MFEM Overweight 8 Positions Relative to GEM
Symbol Grade Weight
SBSW D 0.11%
SGRP D 0.09%
FN D 0.09%
CAR C 0.05%
SBLK F 0.05%
SIMO D 0.04%
ZTO F 0.04%
AKO.A F 0.02%
MFEM Underweight 25 Positions Relative to GEM
Symbol Grade Weight
BABA D -1.93%
IBN C -0.8%
HDB C -0.46%
WIT A -0.21%
QFIN B -0.2%
UMC F -0.18%
TCOM B -0.18%
BIDU F -0.15%
NU C -0.14%
BGNE D -0.11%
SCCO F -0.09%
BAP A -0.08%
ATHM D -0.07%
ABEV F -0.07%
LI F -0.06%
TAL F -0.06%
BEKE D -0.05%
ERJ B -0.05%
XP F -0.05%
ASAI F -0.04%
CSAN F -0.04%
IQ F -0.03%
BVN F -0.03%
PAGS F -0.03%
BZ F -0.03%
Compare ETFs